ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: xionghuixh
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og30

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2008-6-18 22:01:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用PeterZhou在2006-3-13 11:38:00的发言:
呵呵, 插一个问题,
  

188. The information in the passage suggests that which of the following, if true, would make donating excess inventory to charity less attractive to manufacturers than dumping?

(A) The costs of getting the inventory to the charitable destination are greater than the above-cost tax deduction.

(B) The news media give manufacturers’ charitable contributions the same amount of coverage that they give dumping.

(C) No straight-cost tax benefit can be claimed for items that are dumped.

(D) The fair-market value of an item in excess inventory is 1.5 times its cost.

(E) Items end up as excess inventory because of a change in the public’s preferences.

答案C是什么意思啊?望NN给我指点一下了。多谢

我理解是:

无法直接从倾销产品中获得税收的优惠。这句话本来就与原文lines 17-18, which state that inventory-dumping entails “a straight cost write-off on…taxes.”相矛盾;另外,既然倾销没有优惠,那么相比较donate就更加吸引人了。。。


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-6-18 22:02:57编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-18 01:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部