- UID
- 623465
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-4-12
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
今天给大家post 5个不同的故事吧~ 速度1:
 What Sleep Crime Tells Us About Consciousness
There was nothingoutwardly unusual about the man who showed up at the Minnesota Regional Sleep DisordersCenter on June 27, 2005. Like thousands of other clinic patients, BenjaminAdoyo (not his real name) was a sleepwalker. A 26-year-old college student,originally from Kenya, Adoyo had been wandering at night since childhood.Lately, though, the behavior had been getting worse. Adoyo had gotten marriedin February, and his wife would wake to him shaking her while looming overtheir bed and babbling unintelligibly. Scared, she would simply do her best torouse Adoyo, who, once awakened, never remembered a thing. They lived in aone-bedroom apartment in Plymouth, a suburb of Minneapolis, and thesleepwalking was straining their young marriage. The referral form from Adoyo'sprimary care doctor noted that the patient's wife was “sometimes startled by hisbehavior, but no injury, per se.” After evaluatingAdoyo, the sleep center's clinicians directed him to return on August 10 for anovernight electroencephalography (EEG) study of the electrical waves generatedby his brain during sleep. In the middle of the night, Adoyo began thrashingabout and yanking at the wires connected to the electrodes, pulling out tuftsof hair as he ripped them off. But he did not wake up. The next morning MichelCramer Bornemann, director of the center, told Adoyo that the study supported adiagnosis of a sleep disorder known as a non-REM parasomnia. Recounting whenAdoyo ripped off the sensors, Bornemann asked, “Do you recall feeling any pain orpulling? (253) 速度2:
 Aspiration Makes Us Human
Sit down with an anthropologist to talk about the natureof humans, and you are likely to hear this chestnut: “Well, you have toremember that 99 percent of human history was spent on the open savanna insmall hunter-gatherer bands.” It's a classic cliché of science, and it's true.Indeed, those millions of ancestral years produced many of our hallmarktraits—upright walking and big brains, for instance. Of course, those wildlyuseful evolutionary innovations came at a price: achy backs from our bipedalstance; existential despair from our large, self-contemplative cerebral cortex.As is so often the case with evolution, there is no free lunch. Compounding thechallenges of those trade-offs, the world we have invented—and quite recentlyin the grand scheme of things—is dramatically different from the one to whichour bodies and minds are adapted. Have your dinner come to you (thanks to thepizza delivery guy) instead of chasing it down on foot; log in to Facebook tointeract with your nearest and dearest instead of spending the better part ofevery day with them for your whole life. But this is where the utility of theanthropologist's cliché for explaining the human condition ends. (202) 速度3:
 Researchers Disagree About How to Extend Human Lifespan
An American born a century ago would have been expectedto live, on average, just 54 years. Many children died young, and giving birthwas one of the most dangerous things a woman would do. But thanks tovaccinations, antibiotics, sanitation and better maternal care, we are now muchmore likely to die in old age than in our youth. An infant born today shouldlive to see a 78th birthday. The easy gainsagainst the grim reaper have been won. Now as people live to ever older ages,they confront two broad sets of forces that conspire to impose the ultimatehuman limit. First, each extra year we live means another year of accumulateddamage to the body's cells and organs—damage that slower cellular-repairsystems cannot quite fix. In addition, age is the biggest risk factor forcommon deadly ailments that researchers have been relatively powerless against,such as cancer, heart disease andAlzheimer's. (156)
速度4:
 Experiments Scientists Would Do If They Lived Indefinitely
A lifetime is very long relative to the picosecond ittakes for two atoms to form a molecule, but it is the blink of an eye comparedto many natural phenomena, from the rise of mountain chains to the collisionsof galaxies. To answer questions that take more than a lifetime to resolve,scientists hand their efforts down from one generation to the next. In medicalscience, for example, longitudinal studies often follow subjects well after theoriginal researchers have passed; some studies that are still ongoing startedas far back as the 1920s. The record for the most extensive sequence ofuninterrupted data gathering in history may belong to the ancient Babylonians' AstronomicalDiaries, which contain at least six centuries' worth of observations from thefirst millennium B.C.; those records have revealed recurring patterns in suchevents as solar and lunar eclipses. In most fields ofscientific research, however, some of the most interesting and fundamentalquestions remain open because scientists simply have not had enough time topursue them. But what if time were no object? I recently spoke with leadingresearchers in various fields about the problems they would attack if they had1,000 years—or 10,000 or even a million—to make observations or performexperiments. (To keep the focus on the science rather than on futurology, Iasked them to assume they could use only technology that is state of the arttoday.) Condensed versions of their intriguing replies follow. (245)
速度5: 10,000 YEARS: HOW DID LIFEBEGIN? Robert Hazen, earth scientist at George Mason University In the early1950s Stanley Miller and Harold Urey of the University of Chicago famouslyshowed that some basic building blocks of life, such as amino acids, formspontaneously given the right conditions. It seemed that solving the mystery ofthe origin of life could be just a matter of combining the right chemicals andwaiting long enough. It has not turned out to be that simple, but over 10,000years or so a modern version of the Urey-Miller experiment might yield somerudimentary self-replicating molecule able to evolve through naturalselection—in short, life. An experiment tosimulate the origin of life has to take place in a geochemically plausibleenvironment and start from scratch. The primordial soup may have containedmillions of different kinds of small molecules, which could combine and reactin an astronomical number of possible ways. In the ocean, though, they wouldhave been so diluted that the chances of any two molecules running into eachother, much less reacting chemically, were very low. The most plausibleexplanation is that self-replicating molecules first assembled on the surfaceof rocks. The wet surfaces of primordial Earth would have constituted a vastnatural laboratory, running perhaps 1030 little experiments at any onetime, over a period of maybe 100 million to 500 million years.A 10,000-yearlaboratory effort could attempt to re-create this situation by running hugenumbers of tiny experiments simultaneously. These molecular nurseries wouldlook from the outside like rooms filled with racks of computer servers, butinside there would be chemical “labs-on-chips” containing hundreds of microscopicwells, each with different combinations of compounds reacting on a variety ofmineral surfaces. The chips would constantly and autonomously monitor thereactions to check for signs that a molecule had gone into runawayself-replication. (305)
越障:
 Drinking TooMuch? Blame Your Glass
Before youdown that pint, check the shape of your glass—you might be drinking more beerthan you realize. According to a new study of British beer drinkers, an opticalillusion caused by the shape of a curved glass can dramatically increase thespeed at which we swill. Binge drinking is a growingproblem in the United Kingdom, particularly among young people, saysexperimental psychologist Angela Attwood of the University of Bristol. The risein drinking and associated criminal activity is so severe, she says, that "peopleare getting more and more reluctant to venture into city centers atnight." Aside from increases in crime, binge drinking is a public healthrisk: according to the World Health Organization (WHO), the harmful use ofalcohol—defined as drinking that damages health and has negative socialrepercussions—results in 2.5 million deaths per year worldwide and is the thirdlargest factor in the global burden of disease. Although WHO describeslegislative solutions such as raising the price of alcohol and increasing thedrinking age as effective interventions, such measures are so unpopular thatmany governments are reluctant to implement them. Given the difficulty ofcontrolling drinking with legislation, Attwood and her colleagues hope to curbit through education. People don’t always realize how much or how fast they'redrinking, she explains. For example, a previous study by a team of researchersat Queen Margaret University in the United Kingdom found that the mean alcoholcontent in a "usual" single drink poured by subjects was actuallytwice that of the standard U.K. alcohol "unit" used to measureconsumption. Attwood suspected that the shape of a beer glass, which can givethe appearance of different volumes to the same amount of liquid, might alsodistort perception of how much alcohol is being consumed. To test the hypothesis, she andher colleagues randomly divided 160 young, healthy people—students and facultymembers of the University of Bristol, as well as some members of the generalpublic—into eight groups. It wasn't difficult to recruit participants, Attwoodsays. " eople tend to be quite happy to get free lemonade or beer."Using the standard WHOtest for hazardous drinking, called AUDIT, the researchers screenedthe participants to include only "social beer drinkers," notalcoholics. They assigned each group to drink either about 177 milliliters orabout 354 milliliters of lager or soft drink from straight or curved glasses.While the participants drank, they watched a nature documentary deemedemotionally neutral, so that they wouldn’t be "sitting there with nothingto do but drink," Attwood says. The team videotaped the drinkers over twosessions, disguising the real purpose of the test with a fake word search taskat the end of each session. After watching video of bothsessions and recording how much time it took for the drinkers to finish theirbeer or sodas, Attwood’s team found that one groupconsistently drank much faster than the others: the group drinking afull glass of lager out of curved flute glasses. In a paper published thismonth in PLoS ONE, the team reports that whereas the group with straightglasses nursed their 354 milliliters of lager for about 13 minutes, the groupwith the same amount of beer served in curved glasses finished in less than 8minutes, drinking alcohol almost as quickly as the soda-drinkers guzzled theirpop. However, the researchers observed no differences between people drinking177 milliliters of beer out of straight versus fluted glasses. Attwood believes that the reasonfor the increase in speed is that the halfway point in a curved glass isambiguous. Social beer drinkers, she says, naturally tend to pace themselveswhen drinking alcohol, judging their speed by how fast they reach half-full.Another experiment in which participants were asked to judge different levelsof fluid in photographs of straight and curved glasses showed that peopleconsistently misjudge the volume in fluted glasses, Attwood says. A simplesolution to this problem would be to mark beer glasses with the accuratehalfway point, she says. "We can't tell people not to drink, but we cangive them a little more control." Jan Gill, an experimentalpsychologist at Queen Margaret University who helped establish that people havea tendency to overpour, agrees that Attwood and colleagues have shown aninteresting effect of glass shape on how fast people drink. However, severalaspects of the study give her pause. For example, she thinks that the inclusionof people who drink up to 50 units of alcohol per week—roughly 12 liters of3.5% to 4% strength beer -- is pushing the limit on what constitutes a"social beer drinker." At that level of consumption, she thinkspeople will drink quickly no matter what because they're "just drinking toget drunk." (804) 真心被越障的排版纠结到了 还是给原始链接~~~ http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/08/drinking-too-much-blame-your-gla.html |
|