ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: suntree846
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原始] 8月14早场放狗,二战710分不高够用,真情回馈CD。

[精华] [复制链接]
11#
发表于 2012-8-14 19:20:23 | 只看该作者
恭喜恭喜~~超羡慕的啊~不过也真是不容易啊~~是og13还是是12啊?= =
12#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-14 19:38:58 | 只看该作者
恭喜恭喜~~超羡慕的啊~不过也真是不容易啊~~是og13还是是12啊?= =
-- by 会员 guni霖 (2012/8/14 19:20:23)


你是指狗狗?应该是OG12的,但是13我也买了,有可能弄混了,不过应该是12的
13#
发表于 2012-8-14 20:07:20 | 只看该作者
恭喜LZ~~~~!
14#
发表于 2012-8-14 20:50:57 | 只看该作者
楼主 弱弱问一下,你的IR多少分呢  没做完影响大吗
15#
发表于 2012-8-14 21:04:03 | 只看该作者
恭喜楼主啦~
16#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-14 21:05:54 | 只看该作者
楼主 弱弱问一下,你的IR多少分呢  没做完影响大吗
-- by 会员 lylove47 (2012/8/14 20:50:57)


我没看到IR分啊,发的非正式成绩单翻来覆去找不到,我也着急呢呜呜
17#
发表于 2012-8-14 21:52:21 | 只看该作者
恭喜楼主。谢谢放狗。
18#
发表于 2012-8-14 23:06:13 | 只看该作者
LZ说的第一个洛基的变体是这个吧?

22. In the arid land along the Colorado River, use of the river's water supply is strictly controlled: farms along the river each have a limited allocation that they are allowed to use for irrigation. But the trees that grow in narrow strips along the river's banks also use its water. Clearly, therefore, if farmers were to remove those trees, more water would be available for cropirrigation.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A)  The trees along the river's banks shelter it from the sun and wind , thereby greatly reducing the amount of water lost through evaporation .
(B)  Owners of farms along the river will probably not undertake the expense of cutting down trees along the banks unless they are granted a greater allocation of water in return .
(C)  Many of the tree species currently found along the river's banks are specifically adapted to growing in places where tree roots remain constantly wet.
(D)  The strip of land where trees grow along the river's banks would not be suitable for growing crops if the trees were removed.
(E)  The distribution of water allocations for irrigationis intended to prevent farms farther upstream from using water needed by farms farther downstream.
19#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-15 07:46:50 | 只看该作者
LZ说的第一个洛基的变体是这个吧?

22. In the arid land along the Colorado River, use of the river's water supply is strictly controlled: farms along the river each have a limited allocation that they are allowed to use for irrigation. But the trees that grow in narrow strips along the river's banks also use its water. Clearly, therefore, if farmers were to remove those trees, more water would be available for cropirrigation.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A)  The trees along the river's banks shelter it from the sun and wind , thereby greatly reducing the amount of water lost through evaporation .
(B)  Owners of farms along the river will probably not undertake the expense of cutting down trees along the banks unless they are granted a greater allocation of water in return .
(C)  Many of the tree species currently found along the river's banks are specifically adapted to growing in places where tree roots remain constantly wet.
(D)  The strip of land where trees grow along the river's banks would not be suitable for growing crops if the trees were removed.
(E)  The distribution of water allocations for irrigationis intended to prevent farms farther upstream from using water needed by farms farther downstream.
-- by 会员 dingzhiyu (2012/8/14 23:06:13)


是这个,但是考的是加强,题目熟悉选项陌生。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-25 11:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部