- UID
- 766424
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-6-3
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
8.18独立:The best way to improve the quality of education is to increase teachers'
As the contemporary society develops strikingly,the youngsters need accept ( 我觉得need+名词就行了,不然也应该用need+to do)high-qualityeducation to enhance their competitivenesscompetition, which canhelp them getting/findinghunting(我觉得hunting是找工作的过程,但我想你的意思是找到更好的工作) great jobs.Thus, we would consider it is a question that whatapproach can improve the quality of education to make students excellent. Somepeople hold the viewpoint that schools should increase teachers’ salaries tostrengthen the education. However, I personally believe that althoughincreasing teachers’ salaries may have a certain extent of effects, it is notthe best most effective wayto improve the quality of education as the following aspects.
To begin with, modern teaching facilities are indispensableindispensible part ofeducation and they have been exerting profound influence on the way we learn.Take Japanese(是不是应该是Japanesestudying department?) department asan example. The seniors studentsmajoring in Japanese have the courses regarding simultaneous interpretation., when they areseniors.With this situation, professorsneed simultaneous interpretation equipments to conveniently and effectivelyteach students. If universities have no such equipments, it is in the approachhigh-quality education that the professors cannot teach students.(这句话我没有懂诶,是用的强调语气?) Thus,advanced teaching facilities are increasingly(个人觉得前面的举例没有体现越来越significant,所以我觉得去掉increasingly比较好) significantto improve the education quality in the modernschools, on the grounds that good facilities can effectively offer studentsexcellent learning environment and professionally help students enhance theirown abilities. (我觉得这里点名一下“所以提升facilities是improve thequality of education 的重要一点”会比较紧扣主题一点)
Furthermore, the teaching skills of professorsalso play a vital role in the quality of education. Even thoughthe different professors teach the same knowledge, there will be differenteffects on the comprehension of students.Different professors will have distincteffects on the comprehension of students in terms of teaching same knowledge. That means This isbecause that the experienced professors may explain theknowledge in a simple way to understand, while the new professors may have lessexperience to explain the knowledge and teach it in a relatively complicated uneffective way.At this time, students may understand more concerning the same knowledge in thesimple way than its counterpart in the complex way. ConsequentlyIn conclusion, theteaching skills are also vital for schools to improve the quality of education.
However, it is undeniable that increasingteachers’ salaries may encourage teachers to more focusmore ontheir teaching than ever before, because teachers also need money to supporttheir family. In contrast, this way may have a certain degree of effects oneducation quality, whereas it is not the best way to influence on education,due to the same vital role of teaching facilities and skills. (这段让步要不要和conclusion合为一体?)
Taking all the above points into consideration, Iam convinced that there are many other approaches which also haveessential position in the way to improve the education quality, such asteaching equipments and skills. Thus, increasing the teachers’ salaries is notthe best way to attain high-quality education. 我觉得观点表达的不错,词汇量也蛮大的(比我大!!膜拜词汇量大的人 @_@)连接词有的用的不太合适,有的用逻辑连接词的地方可能需要思考一下逻辑是不是合理。 有的语言微微有点罗嗦,可以简化。另外建议多用被动句。 不过有的地方是我的常规用法,并不是你错了。所以修改仅供参考哈。
8.18综合:TPO16
The lecture mainly points out that the science ofarchaeology was improved by a new British government guideline in the twentiethcentury. However, this viewpoint is contradictory to the idea in the readingpassage with the following reasons, according to the professor.
Firstly, the professor asserts that owing to thenew guide, construction could start to be built, after the archaeologists saw examed whetherthe construction sites had archaeological value and interest. If the sites hadthe value, the government and archaeologists would make a plan to preserve thesites. In contrast, this viewpoint is opposite (In contrast和the viewpointis opposite有点语义重复吧)to the pointin the passage that valuable artifacts were lost to construction projects.
Secondly, the professor argues against that it wasinadequate that the financial support for archaeological research from thegovernment in the twentieth century. The professor demonstrates that thepayment for the archaeological research was paid by the construction companies,rather than the government. It was new financial support.
Thirdly, the passage claims that it was difficultto have a career in archaeology. However, the professor rebuts that the presentcareer in archaeology was one of the jobs which could attain the highestpayment and has increasing job opportunities,on the grounds that the new guideline offered a lot of new paid work forarchaeologists and also the expert archaeologists were hired all stages of theprocess to construction. 综合写作我还不太熟。语法上逻辑上都挑不出啥错。就是问一下 professorargue什么的要不要用过去时? 第一次帮人改,不好的地方见谅哦!欢迎就意见不一致的地方进行探讨!谢谢啦!
|
|