请问这题逻辑题如何理解！欢迎进来！

hq304744879

Mystery stories often feature a brilliant detective and the detective's dull companion.Clues are presented in the story,and the companion wrongly infers an inaccurate solution to the mystery using the same clues that the detective uses to deduce the correct solution.Thus,the author's strategy of including the dull companion gives readers a chance to solve the mystery while also diverting them from the correct solution.

which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?


A. Most mystery stories feature a brilliant detective who solves the mystery presented in the story
B. Mystery readers often solve the mystery in a story simply by spotting the mistakes in the reasoning of the detective's dull companion in that story.
C. Some mystery stories give readers enough clues to infer the correct solution to the mystery
D. The actions of the brilliant detective in a mystery story rarely divert readers from the actions of the detective's dull companion.
E. The detective's dull companion in a mystery story generally uncovers the misleading clues that divert readers from the mystery's correct solution.

pinkking

答案是不是C

hq304744879

是的~ 答案是C，这是power score上的一题，就是不知道为什么选C，嘿嘿~　望大牛们解释一下啦

潇湘妃竹1990

我是这么认为的哈~
这道题应该是问结论，所以选项传达的意思必须只在原文信息之内，不能自主生造。

原文说侦探小说里一般会有个牛逼侦探和二逼搭档，线索是被呈现出来了的，一般二逼搭档通过这些线索推断出的是错误结论，而牛逼侦探用这些线索推测出正确结论。所以作者用包含了二逼搭档的手法让读者可以得出正确结论也可以被二逼搭档带偏。

A项说大多数神探小说的特点，原文只说勒侦探小说的一般特点，生造了；
B项说读者得到正确结论的方式是指出二逼搭档的错误，原文没说读者是怎么得出正确答案的，生造了；
C项有些小说给读者足够线索推出正确结论，正是结论句中的第一种情况——读者自己成功得出正确结论；
D项说牛逼侦探不会将读者怎么怎么样，原文没提侦探和读者的互动，生造了；
E项说二逼搭档经常暴露一些错误线索使得读者走偏。原文没有说二逼搭档舞蹈读者的方式是通过提供错误线索（况且原文木有提错误线索），生造了。BTW,我觉得如果此选项改成“二逼搭档有可能将读者带偏”也是可以选的（只要没涉及到具体怎样的方式）

So, C~

hq304744879

谢谢咯，深受启发啊~~