ISSUE 65 求拍砖啊求拍砖啊~

limpid41

65. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.

社会中的每个人都应该遵守公平的法律，不遵守或者违抗不公平的法律。(461)




 Laws are a kind of behavior norms, constraining people,protecting the interests of them and making society orderly. Of course, every person has a duty to obey laws and according to legal ways to appeal for altering unjust laws. But, what is really the just or unjust laws? The gouging standards of different regions varies from each other.what's more, things are always changing including laws. It's imprecise to categorize laws into only two sort---just and unjust ones.



It is deniable that people should adhere to laws in civilized era. Without laws, the state and the whole society will be in disarray: if we buy a inferior good spending a lot of money, we only stay at home and complain such bad luck and the merchant are not responsible for that;  after working so hard , the boss doesn't pay us; people can even kill others with his or her willingness and don't be punished. We need laws to protect the interests of us and to give a punch to those wicked.  



Laws are made by humans, which surely exist the unjust or bias points, ignored when enacting. It's our duty to urge the authority to amend or revise such laws with proper legal ways, making them more sound and fair. While using improper methods ,such as launching a turmoil, threatening the security, to resist may broke the balance of society even harm the development  of a country.



However, what's the accurate definition of impartial or partial statutes? Dividing the laws to these two kinds is too simple. Is it just when sacrifice minors' interests to protect the majorities' ? Laws can't satisfy everyone's desire, and sometimes it has no choice but overlook some individual's benefits to maintain the steady of community.



Furthermore, each state has its own laws depending its special conditions and changing with the transitions of people's values. For example, death penalty, allows in many Asian countries but not in America or other states. Someone consider it's unfair due to laking humanism and others think to those crimes in felony, only capital punishment can warn people that the cost of breaching the laws is elephantine even life. We can't value which one is fair or not since those laws are on the basis of different countries' situations. Other cases like abortion , homosexual marriage ,which were forbidden in the past, passing through many hard times, now gradually become legal in some places.



   That regarding laws as just or not is imprecise and too simple. Laws are complicated , impacted by many factors. Only if people hew to the laws, legal system will gradually improve. And laws also need to amend continually with the social progress. Using illegal ways to disobey the unjust laws can even bring about counterproductive results.  

周花生

提纲写出来好吗

周花生

It is deniable that people should adhere to laws in civilized era（这里有点别扭。。。一般是，，it is undeniable）. Without laws, the state and the whole society will be in disarray: if we buy a inferior good spending a lot of money, we only stay at home and complain such bad luck and the merchant are not responsible for that;  after working so hard , the boss doesn't pay us; people can even kill others with his or her willingness（可以换成 on impluse 脑子一热 就干掉了别人） and don't be punished（will not be punished）. We need laws to protect the interests of us and to give a punch to those wicked.  


Laws are made by humans, which surely exist the unjust or bias points, ignored when enacting.(which,只能指代前面那个名词，我觉得你这里是想说法律吧，语法有一点点混乱。。。) It's our duty to urge the authority to amend or revise such laws with（in） proper legal ways, making them more sound and fair. While using improper methods ,such as launching a turmoil, threatening the security, to resist ,(貌似没看到主语,people?)may broke the balance of society even harm the development  of a country.


However, what's the accurate definition of impartial or partial statutes? Dividing the laws to these two kinds is too simple(simple可以换一个高级点的词 inaccurate and imprudent 还压了韵哈哈我的最爱). Is it just when sacrifice minors' interests to protect the majorities' ?（有点怪怪的。。。） Laws can't satisfy everyone's desire, and sometimes it has no choice but overlook some individual's benefits to maintain the steady of community.



Furthermore, each state has its own laws depending its special conditions and changing with the transitions of people's values. For example, death penalty, （which is allowed）allows in many Asian countries but not in America or other states(countries). Someone consider it's unfair due to( its) laking humanism and others think that to(for/considering) those crimes in felony, only capital punishment can warn people that the cost of breaching the laws is elephantine even life. We can't value which one is fair or not since those laws are on the basis of different countries' situations. Other cases like abortion , homosexual marriage ,which were forbidden in the past, passing through many hard times, now gradually become legal in some places



内容还可以吧，
但是语法词汇欠缺一点。



改作文，攒人品！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！

竹林中人

感觉中间的2.3.4段谈的不够透，有点点到为止的感觉

limpid41

好几年没有写英语作文了。。比较生涩。。
有时候思维混乱，又想用长句。。结果就成这个鸟样了。。哈哈。。积极改正积极改正。。
谢谢指正！

limpid41

因为没有话题写，所以变成要开好几个论点展开。。
但是却无法深入地分析。。。
而且对这种比较特殊的题目更是如此。。
虽然是文科生，法律在书本上根本就是皮毛。。后来搞科研了。。就更加忽略了一些其他知识的积累。。