ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1665|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]LSAT-5-2-4

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-10-17 00:50:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]LSAT-5-2-4

欧觉得答案错了,参考答案是B, 欧选E.


(B) Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work  只能造buildings that are not functional for public use, 但是 “buildings that are not functional for public use” 不能推出 这样的building 就是 “buildings that are not unobtrusive.”






原文:A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be unobtrusive。只等价于  if a work of achitetecture is not unobtrusive, then it is not to be both inviting and functional for public use.    推不出 not functional for public use 就 not unobtrusive...



但选项E也不完美,主要是因为原文有个"strong", E里没有,这个strong 很重要吗?


欧还有一个疑问就是 take second place to the total environment 是什么意思?






4. A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be unobtrusive, taking second place to the total environment. Modern architects, plagued by egoism, have violated this precept. They have let their strong personalities take over their work, producing buildings that are not functional for public use.




Which one of the statements below follows logically from the statements in the passage?



(A) Unobtrusive architecture is both inviting and functional.



(B) Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not unobtrusive.



(C) An architect with a strong personality cannot produce buildings that functional well for the public.



(D) A work of architecture that takes second place to the environment functions well for public use.



(E) A work of architecture cannot simultaneously express its architect’s personality and be functional for public use.




沙发
发表于 2004-10-17 05:23:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-4 05:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部