- UID
- 1129821
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2015-7-7
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
这几天也一直在反复看baby姐的这篇帖子,有个地方我很困惑,就是姐姐在谈论Inside-out时说到主动被动的问题,要看原句的意思。第一个例子中:Before scientists learned how to make asynthetic growth hormone, removing it painstakingly in small amounts from the pituitary glands of human cadevers. 划线部分认为题目并没有指出removing的发起人,重点是object,所以被动是可以的。我很赞同这个说法。
但是下面一个例子:
When drafting the Declaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women’s Rights Conventions in 1848, included in it by the author, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was a call for female enfranchisement.
我认同baby姐说的,included的发起人是ECS, adopted---unknown person, 但是从原句哪里是infer出drafting的发起人也是ECS呢?这个drafting和上面那句话中的removing it....有什么地方不同呢( 我了解第一个例子removing it是在主句里,第二个例子drafting it 是在从句里,但也并不能看出来drafting的subject是谁)
还请baby姐或其他牛牛解惑。感谢!
|
|