ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3814|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG_IR_Q3 求讨论

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-7-19 18:36:11 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
求助IR第一个大题(多源推理)的第3题,就是: Let X denote the block rate of the host hotel for a particular conference, and let Y denote the lowest room rate available in the host hotel outside of the conference block. For a conference that requires a two-night hotel stay, which one of the following expressions represents the least amount of discount on the conference registration fee...

OG的思路是:2个晚上的savings就是2(X-Y), 所以discount只要等于X-Y就能吸引客户。
我的问题是,客人的每个不同方案不应该是registration fee (RF) 或者discounted registration fee (DRF) 加上住宿费吗?为什么不算registration fee进去呢?否则就应该是discount应该大于等于 (RF+2Y) - (DRF+2X).


因为肯定要按照OG的思路来么,我就是想求助到底是我哪个部分想错了,或者miss掉什么信息呢?谢谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-7-20 22:02:24 | 只看该作者
亲,你没发现你等式左右都有DRF么?展开后你就会HLL的发现····
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-7-21 14:30:04 | 只看该作者
呃呃,抱歉还是没懂。我把我的问题写详细点哈,麻烦看下:原文P3说:
(1) ...by increasing the conference registration fee by a fixed amount and then offering an equivalent registration fee discount to attendees who book rooms in the block.
所以得出"a fixed amount" = "an equivalent registration fee discount" = RF-DRF
(2) A study has shown that if this registration discount is equal to at least half the potential savings of...strategy则可以deter attendees...
所以得出 (1)中的"an equivalent registration fee discount", 即 RF-DRF>=1/2savings可以deter attendees...
所以RF-DRF>=1/2[(DRF+2x)-(RF+2y)]
=>  RF-DRF>=1/2(DRF-RF)+(x-y)
=>  3/2 (RF-DRF)>=(x-y)
所以RF-DRF要至少等于2/3(x-y)...@@所以到底是哪个地方的理解错咧?
地板
发表于 2012-8-18 12:09:52 | 只看该作者

同问啊!!!

为啥savings里不考虑registration fee的差别呢?
5#
发表于 2012-8-21 05:01:43 | 只看该作者
你的分析:(1) ...by increasing the conference registration fee by a fixed amount and then offering an equivalent registration fee discountto attendees who book rooms in the block.
所以得出"a fixed amount" = "an equivalent registration fee discount" = RF-DRF
(2) A study has shown that if this registration discount is equal to at least half the potential savings of...strategy则可以deter attendees...
所以得出 (1)中的"an equivalent registration fee discount", 即 RF-DRF>=1/2savings可以deter attendees...
直到这里都是对的,下面的则个不等式就出问题了。关键在于:原文Article的第9-16行描述了参加会议的人会使用ROHH strategy和ROB strategy来avoid extra cost of reserving a room within the block at the host hotel(避免多付旅馆的钱),这里的两个策略都没有涉及到registration fee,采用这两个strategy得到的savings与registration fee的打折多少无关。之后文章23-25行说的...is equal to at least half the potential savings of an attendee's particular cost saving strategy,...说明了这里的savings=2(X-Y)。你下面的不等式把会费也算进去了,所以不对。
所以RF-DRF>=1/2[(DRF+2x)-(RF+2y)]
=>  RF-DRF>=1/2(DRF-RF)+(x-y)
=>  3/2 (RF-DRF)>=(x-y)
所以RF-DRF要至少等于2/3(x-y)...@@所以到底是哪个地方的理解错咧?
6#
发表于 2012-10-12 09:30:49 | 只看该作者
我一直想问,两晚都打折才能吸引啊,为什么要除2,算一天的就吸引人了?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-2 21:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部