Helr GMAT题库 周周练 Helr-CR-002 (答案和解析已放出)

zhengjiahan

A  

Johnsonjz

参与讨论
个人认为是B
原文的大致意思是S有东西两个景点，有一条单行道连接，因此游客要想游览两个景点的话就必须从西边的过路到东边。而由于大部分的游客都只想去东边的景点，因此建议组一个只去东边的团。（很明显，答案就是要说明该方案可行）

而B如果成立，也就是说改变游览方案不会产生额外的费用，即两个方案的效果一样，而大多数的tourists 只想去一个景点，那么原文的方案就是可行的。

反之，如果对B取非，也就是说原文提议的旅游方案会产生比原来多的额外费用，那么这无疑是该方案的一个明显的漏洞。在这样的情况下，就不能确保原方案一定可行。

dorothyyy

我觉得选B。

CDE都有明显的问题。在A和B之间纠结了一会儿。
但是原题说的是大家本来是因为从West到East是One-way Road，所以哪怕绝大部分人只想去E也只好从W去E，地方为了方便他们才开通了只去E的团。

A说这样大家去玩E就不会再去W
B说直接去E的价钱不会超过从W去E。

我觉得B是直接相关，支持了这个措施会成功（如果直接去E更贵，大家会处于经济考虑仍然选择从W去E，就达不到效果了。）

5wzy5418

支持baby

Jessica0320

A

The annouced effect is “meet the desire of those tourists”.  So the point relevent to "the desire of tourists" could best support the claim of the proposal.

jsmart

觉得是A

xiaoyongnao

A不對

lixuekai2001

参与讨论
选B

Type of the question: Strengthen

Conclusion: Shelbyville’s travel agency propose to organize tour groups that only travel to the east sight spot to meet the desire of those tourists who just want to go to the east sight spot.

A: the target clients are the kind who "just want to go to the east sight spot". Logically, they won't require travelling to the west spot as both the tour agency and the clients side should be aware of the previous defined route: only go to the east part.

B: the cost of going to the east only won't exceed that of going the west plus the east. It strengths the agency proposal of the new tourism route. Because the target clients are bearing the wasting of money (the cost to the west+the east > the cost to the east only)and the wasting of their time(travel to the west firstly before to their favorite east sight spot). If the agency provide the new "only to the east"tourism route and moreover the cost is no higher than before, the tourists will like the plan and the agency proposal would be successful.

MINOZ芸

选A，最直接相关

romn

在A 和B  选项中纠结...还是认为选B  ------
主要是文中 " will have the announced effect" ，这是站在旅行社的角度， 以广告口吻来说的。 那么显然对于游客吸引力的话，价格肯定是关键因素。所以B 选项的"The cost ....will not exceed...  "命中。