ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: ggjen
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og85想不通啊, 情nn帮帮忙.

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2006-3-4 22:16:00 | 只看该作者

薄冰语法的解释之一是介词短语+Be+主语可倒装


我认为这题并不是out of...为介词短语才倒装,而可能是避免主语过长。看了所有关于OG85的帖子并没有一个关于此句倒装的定论。虽然说不能死抠语法逻辑最重,但是还是不想雾里看花。有哪位大师解答一下?

22#
发表于 2006-5-30 10:23:00 | 只看该作者
tianwan shuo de hao
23#
发表于 2006-6-3 00:59:00 | 只看该作者

a market that is bringing back the chaise lounge, the overstuffed sofa, and the claw-footed bathtub,  has grown out of   America's fascination with all things antique for bygone styles of furniture and fixtures.

if the sentence is revered back, will the sentence is like the shown above?

Thx

24#
发表于 2006-6-29 05:23:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用anyname在2005-2-19 13:51:00的发言:

Out of America's fascination with all things antique has grown {a market} for bygone styles of furniture and fixtures that is bringing back the chaise lounge, the overstuffed sofa, and the claw-footed bathtub.

这里如果用复数,"that bring back...",按就近修饰和主谓一致原则,那必然修饰"bygone styles of furniture and fixtures",逻辑不通。事实上是"a maket is bringing back ...",所以用单数强行使之修饰更远处的a market。改变定语从句中谓语的单复数,强制性地使之修饰比较遥远的名词,在GMAT中很常见。

另外谢谢Billion鼓励。

尽管我不能去确定这种说法是符合语法的,但anyname的说法的确有道理,能够结合逻辑意思说明本题答案中定语从句远离先行词的问题。

那位NN找到这种说法的处处,通知(短信或EMAIL)兄弟一声,谢谢先。

25#
发表于 2006-8-19 23:01:00 | 只看该作者

好像大家都没有看这里,是不是太简单了,请教诸位,bygone styles of furniture and fixtures 有没有歧义呀?看下面的application of commercial fertilizer and irriga­tion

OG128. New hardy varieties of rice show promise of pro­ducing high yields without the costly requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties.
requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties
requirements by earlier high-yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation
requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high-yielding varieties
application of commercial fertilizer and irriga­tion that was required by earlier high-yielding varieties
irrigation and application of commercial fertil­izer that were required by earlier high-yielding varieties

26#
发表于 2006-8-20 23:21:00 | 只看该作者
有谁能看看这个有没有歧义啊~
27#
发表于 2006-8-24 21:46:00 | 只看该作者
请问如果改成 bygone styles of furnitures and fixtures that bring,从语法的角度看that是指代 fixtures 呢?还是指代furnitures and fixtures?
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-24 21:47:22编辑过]
28#
发表于 2006-9-22 01:56:00 | 只看该作者

rockfish的问题就是指代模糊的错误

As and Bs that do (plural)

do is not modifying either A or B... 如果有这个选项,应该是错的

29#
发表于 2007-5-28 09:38:00 | 只看该作者
倒装真的害人不浅.顶一下.NN们都是好样D
30#
发表于 2007-5-28 09:59:00 | 只看该作者
有nn们的讨论真是精彩!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 22:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部