ChaseDream
搜索
12345下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 29369|回复: 49
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD3-41

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-9-24 19:52:00 | 只看该作者

GWD3-41

Q41:


In ancient Thailand, much of the local artisans’ creative energy was expended for the creation of Buddha images and when they constructed and decorated the temples that enshrined them.




  • much of the local artisans’ creative energy was expended for the creation of Buddha images and when they constructed and decorated  the temples that enshrined them

  • much of the local artisans’ creative energy was expended on the creation of Buddha images and on construction and decoration of the temples in which they were enshrined

  • much of the local artisans’ creative energy was expended on the creation of Buddha images as well as constructing and decoration of the temples in which they were enshrined

  • creating images of Buddha accounted for much of the local artisans’ creative energy, and also constructing and decorating the temples enshrining them

  • the creating of Buddha images accounted for much of  the local artisans’ creative energy as well as construction and decoration of the temples that enshrined them

  • 答案是B,但是B中in which they were enshrined中的 they 我觉得有点指代不清,they到底是指什么呢?


    请NN帮忙看看。

    沙发
    发表于 2004-9-24 20:30:00 | 只看该作者
    指代artisans,可用排除法。a。and when 使句子结构有问题. c. as well as 前后要平行d. and also 是绝对不允许的在ets e.句子意思发生了变化,creating-creation
    板凳
     楼主| 发表于 2004-9-24 20:57:00 | 只看该作者

    To killer34888


    enshrined好象是供奉的意思呀,THEY如果是指代artisans,那么从逻辑上好象不太对吧?(我觉得因该是Buddha images被enshrined,但是这样的指代好象又没有语法根据。)



    [此贴子已经被作者于2004-9-24 21:04:34编辑过]
    地板
     楼主| 发表于 2004-9-24 21:04:00 | 只看该作者

    还想问一个指代问题


    代词指代是不是指代最靠近的名词啊?这个最靠近的名词是不是一定要做主语或宾语呢?


    我的意思是:


    Trees are planted by us. They are... (They 是不是优先指代us,如果在They are... 这个句子中逻辑不通,They 才可能去指代 trees )


    Most of trees are planted by us. They are...(They 是不是不能指代trees 啊?因为主语是most,不是trees.)



    谢谢!

    5#
    发表于 2004-9-24 22:58:00 | 只看该作者
    其实你举的两个例子都不具代表性,因为句子间的逗号使得句子各自独立,后句的they不一定就指代前句的主语;隐含指代通常是指主从句,而这种指代大都优先指代主语,比如:Although they ..., people ...,子句的they就应该是指代主句的主语people;关于代词指代,建议可以听一下白勇的xdf网络课堂,里面好像有过分析,不过偶不确定在哪一节课里。
    6#
    发表于 2004-9-29 21:41:00 | 只看该作者


    指代artisans,可用排除法。a。and when 使句子结构有问题. c. as well as 前后要平行d. and also 是绝对不允许的在ets e.句子意思发生了变化,creating-creation

    在og216的解释中

    To convey the idea that shifting a portion of health-benefit costs back to workers has two complementary effects,
    the correct sentence must link grammatically parallel statements of these effects with and also or with not
    only ... but also.

    所以and also是idiomatic的,c不好的我的理解是construct有直接名词形式construction,所以不能用constructing

    7#
    发表于 2004-10-8 00:53:00 | 只看该作者

    对,可以通过排除法选定B.


    不过偶觉得they 指代Buddha images的, ...temples in which they were enshrined应该是说在庙里Buddha佛被祀奉巴,工匠被祀奉是怎么理解呢?


    请大家多多指教的说,感谢!


    [此贴子已经被作者于2004-10-8 0:52:47编辑过]
    8#
    发表于 2004-10-18 11:31:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用roberta在2004-10-8 0:53:00的发言:

    对,可以通过排除法选定B.


    不过偶觉得they 指代Buddha images的, ...temples in which they were enshrined应该是说在庙里Buddha佛被祀奉巴,工匠被祀奉是怎么理解呢?


    请大家多多指教的说,感谢!


    同意roberta, A'B(the local artisans’ creative energy)结构的中心词是B(creative energy  )they能指代 artisans?  且,若指代artisans,意思好像不太通

    大家继续讨论~


    [此贴子已经被作者于2004-10-18 11:32:05编辑过]
    9#
    发表于 2004-10-18 12:04:00 | 只看该作者
    无论从语法还是逻辑上说,这里they只可以指代buddha images,不可以指代artisans,因为代词指代只可以指代中心名词,不可以指代修饰成分。请参考OG83和90
    10#
    发表于 2004-11-29 02:21:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用killer34888在2004-9-24 20:30:00的发言:
    指代artisans,可用排除法。a。and when 使句子结构有问题. c. as well as 前后要平行d. and also 是绝对不允许的在ets e.句子意思发生了变化,creating-creation

    and also为何不允许存在?


    若前面的句子无否定词,则and also是可以被接受的


    OG的解释中到处都用了and also这个用法



    再讨论



    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    IESE MBA
    近期活动

    正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-15 11:02
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部