OG12.68题的问题，OG的解释有问题？？？有人能解答下吗？？？

单调唱

68. The local board of education found that, because the current physics curriculum has little direct relevance to today’s world, physics classes attracted few high school students. So to attract students to physics classes, the board proposed a curriculum that emphasizes principles of physics involved in producing and analyzing visual images.
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest reason to expect that the proposed curriculum will be successful in attracting students?
(A) Several of the fundamental principles of physics are involved in producing and analyzing visual images.
(B) Knowledge of physics is becoming increasingly important in understanding the technology used in today’s world.
(C) Equipment that a large producer of photographic equipment has donated to the high school could be used in the proposed curriculum. (D) The number of students interested in physics today is much lower than the number of
students interested in physics 50 years ago.
(E) In today’s world the production and analysis of visual images is of major importance in communications, business, and recreation
本题OG是这么解释的：If producing and analyzing usual images is of major importance in communications, business,and recretion, the curriculun has clear relevance to today's world andshouldtherefore attract more student. 下面哪一项最有力的support了conclusion，即be sucessful in attracting students。但是E项，只说明了new curriculum所锻炼的能力是现在社会所需要的，可是这样的说明并不能给出丝毫证据来证明它就会成功地attract students。如何解释这个问题？？？

sdcar2010

You do not need to PROVE that the supporting evidence will lead to the conclusion.  You only need to shed more favorable light on the conclusion with the helpf a supporting evidence.

xn8510

因为原文中说，物理课之所以不吸引学生，原因是与现实世界脱离太远。因此，如果新课程所锻炼的能力是社会所需要的，与现实世界紧密联系，那么，就可以成功地吸引学生了。。。

单调唱

！！！Thx

单调唱

因为原文中说，物理课之所以不吸引学生，原因是与现实世界脱离太远。因此，如果新课程所锻炼的能力是社会所需要的，与现实世界紧密联系，那么，就可以成功地吸引学生了。。。-- by 会员 xn8510 (2012/3/30 12:59:25)

单纯看你的回答是有逻辑问题的，因为没有A，所以得不到B，不能就肯定说得到B，就一定需要A，还是充分必要的问题。sdcar2010说的很对，对于support问题，我们仅仅要做的就是support，just shed  more light on the conclusion is OK!