ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2150|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

THE BEST BASIS——问一个关于prompt的问题,5天就要考了,求解惑!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-3-17 18:39:51 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for the ……?

这到底是属于什么类型的题呢?strengthen?还是assumption?是sufficient的还是necessary?


比如这道:

Because of rising costs, United Shipping Company raised its rates by ten percent last year. Many of its customers balked at the increase, however, and turned to a rival company whose rates were lower. In response, United Shipping Company began offering a package of services for a single rate that, though high, is still lower than the combined rates of the individual services. Officers of the company claim that this move will recoup the company's lost profits.

Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for the officers' claim?




United Shipping will aggressively advertise the new package of services.


United Shipping's rival does not offer some of the services included in the package.


Marketing studies have shown that many of United Shipping's former customers would prefer a combined rate for their various shipping services.


United Shipping does not already offer all the services separately.


No other shipping company offers the same package of services as United Shipping.


---来自 manhattan












拜托各位解答一下呀~~~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-17 18:48:13 | 只看该作者
拜托啊拜托~~
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-17 18:54:26 | 只看该作者
up~
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-18 10:24:53 | 只看该作者
+++++++++++++++++++
5#
发表于 2012-3-18 12:48:32 | 只看该作者
C?  题干是assumption题。
6#
发表于 2012-3-18 14:01:41 | 只看该作者
C吧。。。取反后削弱了argument。。。

Premise是说 service合并后 rate低了 (hidden premise: 人们因为rate低才会愿意去买)
conclusion 可以recover lost profit

A 无关
B Rival offer不offer和 rate 无关 不是argument的premise
C 取反后 削弱,尽管rate低了,没人prefer这个所以没人买,lost profit不能被recover
D 取反后 说这个company一直offer所有的服务seperately,有些无关,如果细纠,seperately service的rate相对较高,所以增强了premise,故这个选项取反后增强argument,所以排除
E 其他公司offer不offer service in similar way 不影响premise,因为和减少rate无关。


个人愚见= =。。。
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-18 22:58:51 | 只看该作者
C吧。。。取反后削弱了argument。。。

Premise是说 service合并后 rate低了 (hidden premise: 人们因为rate低才会愿意去买)
conclusion 可以recover lost profit

A 无关
B Rival offer不offer和 rate 无关 不是argument的premise
C 取反后 削弱,尽管rate低了,没人prefer这个所以没人买,lost profit不能被recover
D 取反后 说这个company一直offer所有的服务seperately,有些无关,如果细纠,seperately service的rate相对较高,所以增强了premise,故这个选项取反后增强argument,所以排除
E 其他公司offer不offer service in similar way 不影响premise,因为和减少rate无关。


个人愚见= =。。。
-- by 会员 howie0420 (2012/3/18 14:01:41)



是的,thx~正解!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-5 02:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部