Issue 63——是否应该竭尽全力保护濒危动物？求拍！谢谢！！

greenfish7

63) There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
As technology advances, creatures in Earth are more endangered and animal conservation has been attracting people's attention since this problem surged. Controversy surrounds the question of whether society should spare no efforts to save endangered animal or plantspecies, ruling out the consideration of money or jobs. In my perspective, it is justifiable to build shelters for endangered animals or plants, in view of humans' deeds nowadays; however, unrealistic is it that all of the endangered species could be discovered and preserved.

It is obvious today that humans'  behaviors have exerted numerous impacts on Earth, which threatened the living of many sorts of animals and plants. To expand their territory, some governments fill sea with materials on land to "excavate" a new land for themselves,which violates the rules of nature. This might rise up sea level and thus some animals living near the sea may have nowhere to go; in fact, this is also pernicious for humans' living as well. To jockey for the tremendous profits behind whales,Japanese continued decimating them regardless of international protests, making the number of this specious animal decreased exponentially. Many other examples are not far to discover. These deeds do much harm to the world.

Thus, no matter for compensation orresponsibility, mankind has to save most of the endangered animals to keep the whole biological chain balanced. If human beings failed to concentrate on this,perhaps in the future it is ironic that humans are the ultimate one to be endangered. Actually, people have received much vicious influence resulting from their primacy, which humans conferred to themselves without nature's permission. The biological chain is vulnerable, in which quantity of creatures' disappearance might result in the debacle of itself. Therefore, it is necessary for people to save this chain as a whole, evading the final tragedy ofthemselves.

However, it is unrealistic for humans to save every endangered creature. Both shelters' construction and the jobs concerning with this are extraordinarily expensive. If people spare no efforts to save each of the creatures, it is possible that the development of human society is marred, which also needs scads of funds and jobs to support. Humans should save those animals which are the most desirable and endangered, or which are not able to propagate under natural conditions, such as pandas.

On balance, humans are in obligation to save those animals and plants which are endangered for the sake of human deeds;however, it is not realistic to save every creature endangered, taking some factors such as money or jobs into account.

普渡哥

in fact, this is also pernicious for humans' living as well.

这句话不专业。。

竹林中人

unrealistic is it that ？？？
关于倒数第二段我有点建议是，有些生物的消失无法证明是不是人类的活动造成的，可能是自己进化的结果，自然淘汰，这样我们也是很难做到的

greenfish7

unrealistic is it that ？？？
关于倒数第二段我有点建议是，有些生物的消失无法证明是不是人类的活动造成的，可能是自己进化的结果，自然淘汰，这样我们也是很难做到的

-- by 会员 竹林中人 (2012/3/13 12:51:48)

嗯，写的时候一急就忘了。。哎呀~~