【每日阅读训练第三期——速度越障1系列】【1-13】文史哲

dengly

2.07
1.56
2.10
1.22
2.09
自由1.45

越障11.42

半阙

01:40

01:48

01:56

01:34

01:30

01:39

越障完全不知所云。。。。这么BT的文章应该给考LSAT的孩纸们看去。。。。

aprilzhanghj

1'53
2'01
2'08
1'33
1'51
2'16

速度：clinton's presidency.
The investigation of whitewater case against Clinton and Hillary, which was not decided yet becasue of the suspicious of flavor among representative and democratic.
The Clinton's sexua scandle with Monica was investigated and Clinton was the second president in American history to be peached agianst in front of representatives and trials been hold to decide whether his presidency should be removed.

阅障：爱死这种文章了，我们就需要这种难度的来练习。

The author's evaluation of motivated reasoning and the justice reform and style changing. The author thought that motivated reasoning is prevalent among court and hold social scientific value. Though some justices cannot be changed, those who will be elected can be changed by the framing not by Kanan's framework.
The author believe the Kanan's opinion cannot hold be true for either intellectual and political reasons.

很邻家

K提出一个东西叫motivated reasoning，but it is not available in practice, for 2 reasons:
1)    The audiences must be shifted.
2)    K wrongly assumed that he is an attached observer.

2. K提出了一个解决方法，就是changing the style of the opinion writing. K是借鉴了H的一个观点，关于什么人权和自卫之类的（不大清楚对不对）
K可能正确如果怎么着的话，但是，H观点中的一个证据表明K不对

3. K提出change the justices, 作者认为这个是完全没问题的，但是如何change是个困难。
Conclusion: the author indicates that K’s view is utopian and vulnerable.

babybearmm

速度：
1'22''
1'03''
1'25''
1'03''
1'11''

越障: 22'32''

1. Motivated reasoning - meaning: First, you believe it. Then, you see it. This is a philosophical theory that explains human cognition and conception. We have to understand it, then we are able to discover it with our eyes. The idea of motivated reasoning makes sense in natural science.

2. Kaham somehow bring this idea of motivated reasoning to the legal system. His theory is called "Foreword" (?), and it is based on natural science.

3. The author's point: Kaham's theory has an inherent disconnection between form and substance
FORM: detached observer
SUBSTANCE: Motivated reasoning is universal

(meaning: If Kaham's view is objective, he must be a detached observer, i.e. aloof, not involved; however, what he observed is influenced by his own position/belief - this is the idea of "believe it, then see it")

The form as a "detached observer" is well-explained in the case of US legal scholarship.... Progressive （这里不懂，这个术语到最后突然又出现了）

The author thinks "detached observer" as partisan ... (inherently biased?)

Then, the passage discussed how Kaham's theory could shape the US legal system in II and III.

II. Change the court style.  
e.g. a case:   a person, DC, gun....?
There are two justices described. They each did a bunch of study, got a bunch of evidence, and wrote a report. They arrived at opposite conclusions.
The serious problem was that: even if one is 55% self-evident, he/she has to vote with an absolute (100%) stance.
The author thinks that this is unfair, and that Kaham's theory of motivated reasoning should jump in and change the way in which the US court works.

III. Change the justice
Kaham's theory calls for a change in the US legal system. However, the big issue is, according to the author, how can that kind of change realize? That is to change the legal culture, instilling in an awareness/appreciation of possibility.
According to the author, it's not to change the mind of the incumbent justices, but to choose the people with that mindset as potential justices. In other words, to work on the future.

IV. Conclusion
Progressive had been once successful (because ....), but later (in around 1950) it tumbled.
The reason for the failure is a)political reason
b) (in the scope of law) intellectual reason
这里我不太懂，感觉Progressive似乎是在讲US legal scholarship的时候出现的，不像是一个贯穿全文的主线啊.感觉贯穿全文的主线是motivated reasoning. 不过我没读懂progressive这个概念，也不明白这两者的关系。
Will Kaham's theory has the same fate as Progressive (fail in the future)? Maybe, the author thinks.

Shelvey辛苦啦，今天的越障我很喜欢啊，很有学术味，尽管我好多地方不怎么懂，呼唤点拨。

搞G战士DB

速度：1‘39  1’22  1‘29   1’26   1‘21  
自由阅读：1’24
越障：9‘43  完全没看懂。Shelvey，真的让我回想起印第安那篇文章痛苦的记忆了……

xunjiejie5

1‘34
1’30
1‘37
1’34
1‘43

七个栗子

2’48
2‘40
2’30
2‘30
2’40

越障等明天来看第二遍的时候写吧，忧伤的没看懂。

风鸣蝉

2'12
2'24
1'45
1'40
1'42
1'52

越障16'06头晕，印象最深的就是只有我相信我才看到。然后谈到司法上人们会因为文化之类的background影响，然后还举了个栗子，最后还谈到了技术…… = = 根本记不住细节

一加heidy

1‘35   1’45  1‘32   1’22   1‘24
越障12分钟，。。。。。。看不懂，只记得只有我相信，我才看得到，然后还有文化什么的，理解不了文章呢