你说JBR不算什么,我先不做评论。 单单说你说你有paper under review on top 1 journal, 什么是undereview? 任何人都可以送paper到top 1上去试,这不代表任何东西,更无法证明你的能力。我想你应该知道under review 和 under revision的区别吧。
Hi zhipei,
I do not think a JBR is A-. It used to be good. But now, it is tier-3 to me, if QME, JA, JR, JSR, JIM, IJRM etc. count as tier-2. I don't think it is more than a CV filler for faculty in any decent program. Moreover, anything below that would only hurt you.
I am making some bold claims here. Take it with a grain of salt: It seems you are not even trying to publish in top journals. It seems you (and your coauthor) are aiming at some mediocre achievement at most. If that's also the impression you left in committee, I'm afraid thing would not work very well for you. After all, all top 50 programs want to place their students in research school where only tier-1 and tier-2 count for tenure. I would rather have a strong working paper that I presented in major conferences and under review at tier-1 journal, which is basically what I have.
Please do not take it personal, as I'm trying to rationalize how it happened. FYI, I do not have any letter from big names either.
-- by 会员 zzmypster (2012/3/6 23:32:55)