ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3801|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

lsat-10-2-19, 谢谢!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-6-20 00:00:00 | 只看该作者

lsat-10-2-19, 谢谢!

Marcus: For most ethical dilemmas the journalist is likely to face, traditional journalistic ethics is clear, adequate, and essentially correct. For example, when journalists have uncovered newsworthy information, they should go to press with it as soon as possible. No delay motivated by the journalists’ personal or professional interests is permissible.

Anita: Well, Marcus, of course interesting and important information should be brought before the public-that is a journalist’s job. But in the typical case, where a journalist has some information but is in a quandary about whether it is yet important or “newsworthy,” this guidance is inadequate.

19. In order to conclude properly from Anita’s statements that Marcus’ general claim about traditional journalistic ethics is incorrect, if would have to be assumed that

(A) whether a piece of information is or is not newsworthy can raise ethical dilemmas for journalists.

(B) there are circumstances in which it would be ethically wrong for a journalist to go to press with legitimately acquired, newsworthy information.

(C) the most serious professional dilemmas that a journalist is likely to face are not ethical dilemmas

(D) there are no ethical dilemmas that a journalist is likely to face that would not be conclusively resolved by an adequate system of journalistic ethics

(E) For a system of journalistic ethics to be adequate it must be able to provide guidance in every case in which a journalist must make a professional decision

此题答案是a,
可是我选了e, 我觉得对呀, 而且取费后也确实可以weaken呀,
请nns帮忙指点一下, 谢谢!
沙发
发表于 2003-6-20 00:27:00 | 只看该作者
According to Anita, journalists are likely in a quandary about whether the information is important or newsworthy.So, if such phenomenen can cause ethical dilemmas,Marcus's claim is incorrect for excluding this possibility.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-6-20 23:48:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢 tocean0222
是不是e只是作为一个充分条件, 而不是必要条件, 所以不对呀?
地板
发表于 2003-6-21 00:27:00 | 只看该作者
assumption的意思是必要条件。必要条件的意思是取非原文结论一定不成立,而不是仅仅削弱就可以了。如果你理解到对e取非是削弱,那e当然就不是答案。
5#
发表于 2003-6-21 09:29:00 | 只看该作者

嗯哪!!!

以下是引用siebel在2003-6-21 0:27:00的发言:
assumption的意思是必要条件。必要条件的意思是取非原文结论一定不成立,而不是仅仅削弱就可以了。如果你理解到对e取非是削弱,那e当然就不是答案。
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-6-21 12:03:00 | 只看该作者
有道理, 谢谢.  

以下是引用siebel在2003-6-21 0:27:00的发言:
assumption的意思是必要条件。必要条件的意思是取非原文结论一定不成立,而不是仅仅削弱就可以了。如果你理解到对e取非是削弱,那e当然就不是答案。
7#
发表于 2003-6-21 12:20:00 | 只看该作者
传统标准(即NEWWORTHY的新闻马上报告)是在对付ETHNIC DILEMMA方面足够了。
由于有时候会犹豫某信息是否newworthy,所以标准不足够。
A正好是GAP

E我觉得偏离了Anita驳斥的焦点。。不能算支持对anita的驳斥。。也当然不算assumption
因为,Marcus也是支持E的观点的。。。即需要一个ADEQUATE标准。。两个人不同意的地方在于: Marcus默认NEWWORTHY的新闻不需要判断,不会引起犹豫,所以现行标准是ADEQUATE的。。。而ANITA认为newworTHY还是会引起犹豫,所以现形标准仍然can raise ethnic dilemma...

欢迎讨论!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-20 05:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部