ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 风景
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LBS(伦敦商学院)能和美国的商学院的top15相比吗?

[复制链接]
31#
发表于 2006-8-14 13:01:00 | 只看该作者

关键问题是大家想在哪里就业

如果想在US就业的话, LBS还不如US TOP 30

如果不是非在US就业不可的话

LBS可以算是FINANCE的TOP 5

32#
发表于 2006-8-14 13:51:00 | 只看该作者

But, the thing is, most people prefer US rather than EU.

And even fewer people, who will graduate from the Top b-schools, would like to go back to China.

So......to conclude, few people would pick EU schools, even though they might be as good as US ones.

33#
发表于 2006-8-14 14:15:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用nnm在2006-8-14 13:51:00的发言:

But, the thing is, most people prefer US rather than EU.

And even fewer people, who will graduate from the Top b-schools, would like to go back to China.

So......to conclude, few people would pick EU schools, even though they might be as good as US ones.

make no sense
34#
发表于 2006-8-14 18:21:00 | 只看该作者

why?

逻辑混乱了啊??

35#
发表于 2006-8-14 18:23:00 | 只看该作者

对LBS/Insead等欧洲学校感兴趣的,

到我在欧洲区的帖子看看吧,

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=36&ID=180660&page=2

36#
发表于 2006-8-14 20:35:00 | 只看该作者
And even fewer people, who will graduate from the Top b-schools, would like to go back to China.
May not be true. If you can earn the same in both US, EU and China, you might prefer to come back to China, including HK. The fact is that many young people prefer US (they may not find decent jobs in China), while experienced people prefer to come back since they can find very decent jobs in China, e.g. Mckinsey, IB in HK/mainland, VC/PE, or C level management in MNC. Of course if you were not at management level in big names before business school, you will find that you can find better jobs in US.

关键问题是大家想在哪里就业
如果想在US就业的话, LBS还不如US TOP 30
I disagree. What do you mean by 就业? If you talk about top IB, investment management (e.g.hedge fund, PE/VC) or strategic consulting, then I don't think top 15-30 US schools are comparable to LBS at all. Opportunities in such companies are very global, and it's not difficult for LBS students to relocate to US. The interesting point is that many LBS students used to work in US, but they prefer to work in London after graduation as London experience is very valuable as London is the world no.1 or no.2 financial centre in different financial area.
If you talk about industrial companies, probably it's true. But only a small percentage of LBS students are interested in industrial jobs.

37#
发表于 2006-8-14 21:35:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用kevinao在2006-8-14 20:35:00的发言:
And even fewer people, who will graduate from the Top b-schools, would like to go back to China.
May not be true. If you can earn the same in both US, EU and China, you might prefer to come back to China, including HK. The fact is that many young people prefer US (they may not find decent jobs in China), while experienced people prefer to come back since they can find very decent jobs in China, e.g. Mckinsey, IB in HK/mainland, VC/PE, or C level management in MNC. Of course if you were not at management level in big names before business school, you will find that you can find better jobs in US.
这个部分偶没有发言权, 因为偶是mid-level,还不是managerial的.不过偶同意大侠的说法.
我自己比较想回去的, 在外面漂泊这么久(在可预见的将来还要很久), 很想归根, 老死在中国.

关键问题是大家想在哪里就业
如果想在US就业的话, LBS还不如US TOP 30
I disagree. What do you mean by 就业? If you talk about top IB, investment management (e.g.hedge fund, PE/VC) or strategic consulting, then I don't think top 15-30 US schools are comparable to LBS at all. Opportunities in such companies are very global, and it's not difficult for LBS students to relocate to US. The interesting point is that many LBS students used to work in US, but they prefer to work in London after graduation as London experience is very valuable as London is the world no.1 or no.2 financial centre in different financial area.
If you talk about industrial companies, probably it's true. But only a small percentage of LBS students are interested in industrial jobs.

Partly agree....... I recon that LBS is about in the same level as US top15-30 , provided people hunt for job in US.

I saw an American LBS graduate commented as above.

American kind of think of US as the only develped country around the world, and others as the second tier.

And being said precisely,  London is the second largest center with definitely fewer opportunities than NY.


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-14 21:37:56编辑过]
38#
发表于 2006-8-14 21:41:00 | 只看该作者

话说回来,如果想在欧洲工作,LBS是当然的首选.

LBS金融在欧洲傲视群侪. 当然LSE也不错(别问偶LSE是什么学校)

39#
发表于 2006-8-14 22:17:00 | 只看该作者
1) If you are looking for jobs in NY, I think US top 10 may be better, but here jobs only means ibank jobs as many VC or hedge funds are not in NY. NY should have more Ibank opportunties than London, but not much more as London  is the world's biggest market in some areas (e.g. FX, metal futures) and there are at least 100 LBS students join Ibank every year. Therefore, I guess the LBS graduate mainly talked about industrial jobs, and I don't think you should make conclusion based on one person's comment.
2) If you compare LBS with LSE, then I don't want to make further comments as you do not appear to have basic understanding about business schools. LSE is not a business school, and  LBS graduates almost never compete with LSE graduates. LBS' competitors are mainly Insead and top 10 US schools.
40#
发表于 2006-8-14 22:22:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用kevinao在2006-8-14 22:17:00的发言:
1) If you are looking for jobs in NY, I think US top 10 may be better, but here jobs only means ibank jobs as many VC or hedge funds are not in NY. NY should have more Ibank opportunties than London, but not much more as London  is the world's biggest market in some areas (e.g. FX, metal futures) and there are at least 100 LBS students join Ibank every year. Therefore, I guess the LBS graduate mainly talked about industrial jobs, and I don't think you should make conclusion based on one person's comment.
I'm not a IB guy as you might be, so you should be right.
And(狡辩一下) I think the guy has more say than us since he has got the exact experience in job-hunting of both areas.

2) If you compare LBS with LSE, then I don't want to make further comments as you do not appear to have basic understanding about business schools. LSE is not a business school, and  LBS graduates almost never compete with LSE graduates. LBS' competitors are mainly Insead and top 10 US schools.

Did i compare LBS with LSE in terms of B-Schools?????????

Further more, LSE does have MBA program, although not comparable to LBS, and I did admit that LBS is better than LSE


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-14 22:35:30编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

NTU MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-27 05:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部