|
以下是引用kevinao在2006-8-14 20:35:00的发言: And even fewer people, who will graduate from the Top b-schools, would like to go back to China. May not be true. If you can earn the same in both US, EU and China, you might prefer to come back to China, including HK. The fact is that many young people prefer US (they may not find decent jobs in China), while experienced people prefer to come back since they can find very decent jobs in China, e.g. Mckinsey, IB in HK/mainland, VC/PE, or C level management in MNC. Of course if you were not at management level in big names before business school, you will find that you can find better jobs in US.
这个部分偶没有发言权, 因为偶是mid-level,还不是managerial的.不过偶同意大侠的说法. 我自己比较想回去的, 在外面漂泊这么久(在可预见的将来还要很久), 很想归根, 老死在中国. 关键问题是大家想在哪里就业 如果想在US就业的话, LBS还不如US TOP 30 I disagree. What do you mean by 就业? If you talk about top IB, investment management (e.g.hedge fund, PE/VC) or strategic consulting, then I don't think top 15-30 US schools are comparable to LBS at all. Opportunities in such companies are very global, and it's not difficult for LBS students to relocate to US. The interesting point is that many LBS students used to work in US, but they prefer to work in London after graduation as London experience is very valuable as London is the world no.1 or no.2 financial centre in different financial area. If you talk about industrial companies, probably it's true. But only a small percentage of LBS students are interested in industrial jobs.
Partly agree....... I recon that LBS is about in the same level as US top15-30 , provided people hunt for job in US. I saw an American LBS graduate commented as above. American kind of think of US as the only develped country around the world, and others as the second tier. And being said precisely, London is the second largest center with definitely fewer opportunities than NY.
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-14 21:37:56编辑过] |