大话西游之CR

braveMBA

别光顾着做LSAT，似乎这里成了LSAT CR了。轻松一下，出一道真题。

至尊宝在睡梦中呼唤着两个人的名字，被菩提老祖听见，醒来后，菩提老祖对至尊宝说，“你刚才在睡梦中呼唤着晶晶的名字20遍”，至尊宝差异地问“真的？”。“但是你叫紫霞这个名字765遍”，至尊宝，“啊”。“那个叫紫霞的一定欠你更多钱”

Which of following is an assumption on which the 菩提老祖's argument depends?
A. 晶晶没有欠至尊宝钱，但是紫霞欠了不少
B. 菩提老祖不偏向紫霞，因为她更漂亮
C. 至尊宝不是因为更喜欢紫霞，才在梦中叫她更多遍
D. 科学研究发现，在睡梦中叫人的名字，多是因为该人欠你的钱
E. 至尊宝从来不说梦话，除非有人欠他钱
F. 从脑细胞的结构可以推出，很少梦话的人在说梦话的时候一定是和别人欠他钱有关，而且钱的数量同proportion to名字的数量

albert

C

windtulip

F

albert

F是充分条件不是必要条件

dl7801

e

perfection

F

braveMBA

这道题包含着很多假设题的TRICK，基本上就是ETS的假设思路。大家有兴趣可以讨论一下。我同意ALBERT的意见。我的感觉，在CR上做太多的题意义不是特别大，除了练阅读速度以外。

jacy

我选c,

f 更象找一个principle,
a,b,d无关,
e 更象infer 题

dl7801

This is an interesting question. Let's go further discussing:

菩提老祖's conclusion:那个叫紫霞的一定欠你更多钱
菩提老祖's evidence: 1)你刚才在睡梦中呼唤着晶晶的名字20遍
                              2)但是你叫紫霞这个名字765遍

Assumption is a bridge between the "conclusion" and "evidence" ; that is, only if the assumption is true, we will properly draw the conclusion from the provided evidence.
It is easy to eliminate the  chioce A, B and D in this question.
Let's check the left chioces:

F. 从脑细胞的结构可以推出，很少梦话的人在说梦话的时候一定是和别人欠他钱有关，而且钱的数量同proportion to名字的数量.
Besides unreasonably generalizing "菩提老祖's conclusion", chioce D is at fault in  stating that "很少梦话的人.......". We cannot find any clues whether  "至尊宝说梦话" in his daily dream. If 至尊宝 is a real daily 说梦话 person, how can this choice establish the connection between the " conlusion" and "evidence".

C. 至尊宝不是因为更喜欢紫霞，才在梦中叫她更多遍.
Chioce C rules out another possibility of the reason that 至尊宝在梦中叫紫霞更多遍, but it does not rules out all other possible reasons, such as that 至尊宝更 hates 紫霞 rather than 紫霞的一定欠更多钱 .  The point is, even though chioce C is true, we still cannot properly get any relativity between the conclusion and the two evidences, or we still don't know the relationship between 欠钱 and 梦话. Chioce C, however, supports the conclution somewhat, and if we are looking for the supporting answer, it is the right one.

E. 至尊宝从来不说梦话，除非有人欠他钱
Although not perfect, chioce E makes sense here by using "至尊宝从来不说梦话" , instead of "很少梦话的人在说梦话的时候..." , and indicates that "有人欠他钱" is the only reason for 至尊宝 to 说梦话, establishing a bridge between 欠钱 and 至尊宝说梦话.  Assumption does not must be sufficient to how the conclusion can be drawn from evidences, but it must be necessary.

welcome to dispute my view.

invisiblewy

肯定是C
典型的ETS思路！
braveMBA牛的！编得出嘎经典的题目的说！容我仰视一下！