ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1425|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

lsat-18-4-8

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-8-25 05:21:00 | 只看该作者

lsat-18-4-8

Questions 7-8


The economy is in a dismal state, universities are suffering from cutbacks, and many students must turn to any source of funds available if they are to make ends meet. Faced with this situation, the university has terminated the employment of some of its more productive departmental workers. Why? University regulations prohibit a student's receiving financial aid and then working for an auxiliary income that exceeds a specified limit. Employees whose incomes had reached that limit Employees whose incomes had reached that limit were terminated. Now, the university must find other employees. Unfortunately, though, the university's choice of students to fill the positions will not be based upon their abilities to perform, or even upon their financial need, but upon how much money they have made.


8. Which one of the following is the best statement or the primary point of the passage?


(A) Good student-employees should be able to obtain financial aid and, at the same time, earn auxiliary incomes without limits.


(B) In the face of a declining economy, universities need to be more lenient in their financial aid policies.


(C) University departments must adhere to the university's regulations.


(D) Decisions about student employment should be based entirely upon each student's financial need.


(E) Due to the problems created by a dismal economy, some student-workers have lost their jobs.


the answer is A? how can it be?


沙发
发表于 2004-8-26 07:02:00 | 只看该作者
原文说的是经济不好时大学的折中办法:限制学生在大学赚的钱,以便更多学生能赚点。A说(如果不是经济不好)好学生(好学生才有financial aid )本可以(SHOULD BE ABLE TO)又有financial aid ,在学校赚的钱又不受限制。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-26 12:24:00 | 只看该作者

可是文中并没提到好学生的概念呀, 何况也没有加经济好与不好的限制

为什么E不对呢?

地板
发表于 2004-8-26 18:54:00 | 只看该作者

1。The economy is in a dismal state。即使不是好学生,只要能得 financial aid 就行,加上GOOD,更严谨。不会是BAD学生就有 financial aid ,GOOD学生却没有。

2。E不是primary point

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-26 21:47:00 | 只看该作者

这道题我一看到有好学生字样就排除掉了,觉得这是文中没有出现过的新概念,不可能是main point, 看来这招又不管用了。

lawyer_1 GG,能不能谈谈你作指导题时的思路呢?

谢谢,也请别的NN出手

6#
发表于 2004-8-26 22:02:00 | 只看该作者

不能机械的去理解逻辑,我有时想,国内教逻辑时常很机械的说,新概念,搭桥,他因。。。而又很少说本质原因,结果常进了逻辑设的陷阱

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&ID=65598&page=1

7#
发表于 2004-8-27 00:26:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得这段话大致的意思是:在一些经济状况不好的地方,一些大学终止了与部分学生的雇佣关系,因为他们觉得这些学生既享受到了财物补助,又拿一份打工收入,使得另一些受经济不景气影响的同学不能获得更多打工补贴学费的机会。


在后半段,作者通过Unfortunately, though,...”否定了这一做法。作者认为,雇佣的标准不应该只建立在学生赚钱的多少上,而应该根据学生的表现及财物需求上。这也就是选项A表达的意思。


所以,整段看下来,A是作者要论证说明的中心意思


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-8-27 0:26:57编辑过]
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-27 02:11:00 | 只看该作者

lsat-18-4-8

厉害,你们是一下就看出来了还设经过深思熟虑反复权衡以后才作出来的?要是GMAT真考这样的题,我一定死得很难看。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-6 19:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部