OG42,以前的不明白

lindazhou

thanks. 想了很久，没想明白。一句话惊醒梦中人。

bret

Moreover, when an assembler sets out to master the technology of producing advanced components, the resulting demands on its resources may compromise its ability to assemble these components successfully into end products

如何理解这句话？

bret

ding

toeflboy2005

当COMPONENTS ARE COMMODITIES,利润才提高,如果不是,就不会提高利润了,所以后向一体化不一定会导致卖零件利润率的增加,

kathy8446

同问

Moreover, when an assembler sets out to master the technology of producing advanced components, the resulting demands on its resources may compromise its ability to assemble these components successfully into end products.

如何理解这句话？这里的resources指什么？

忘大牛赐教！

kathy8446

自己顶一下。哪位NN能帮偶？？

mayce

up!

abia

而且，当一个一个assembler开始掌握生产先进零部件的技术时，assembler对其资源的
决定性需求将降低其把这些零部件成功地组装为成品的能力。
这里的resources我的理解为advanced components.就是说学会了组装零部件以后，问
题的根源在于是否有足够的零部件供assembler去组装为成品。

kathy8446

我只是不明白，为什么the resulting demands on its resources may compromise
its ability to assemble these components successfully into end products？

这里its是指代assembler的。是不是说在生产零部件方面的创新消耗了assembler的资源（例如研发经费、人力），所以他们组装的能力(组装方面的创新)就受到了影响？

这样也和后一句Long-term contracts with suppliers can achieve many of the same cost benefits as backward integration without compromising a company’s ability to innovate.比较连得上

yifentsai

同意樓上的, 我也是這樣解讀的:

the ability to assemble these components與master the technology 間有trade-off的關係