99. Concetta: Franchot was a great writer because she was ahead of her time in understanding that industrialization was taking an unconscionable toll on the family structure of the working class. Alicia: Franchot was not a great writer. The mark of a great writer is the ability to move people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be among the first to grasp a social issue. Besides, the social consequences of industrialization were widely understood in Franchot’s day.
In her disagreement with Concetta, Alicia does which one of the following?
A. accepts Concetta’s criterion and then adds evidence to Concetta’s case B. discredits Concetta’s evidence and then generalizes from new evidence C. rejects Concetta’s criterion and then disputes a specific claim D. disputes Concetta’s conclusion and then presents facts in support of an alternative creterion E. attacks one of Concetta’s claims and then criticizes the structure of her argumen
Concetta: Franchot was a great writer. Alicia: Franchot was not a great writer. ---> disputes a specific claim
Concetta:because she was ahead of her time in understanding that industrialization was taking an unconscionable toll on the family structure of the working class.
Alicia: The mark of a great writer is the ability to move people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be among the first to grasp a social issue. --->rejects Concetta’s criterion , A衡量a good writer的criteria 不一樣
我觉得第一个人说的because she was ahead of her time in understanding that industrialization was taking an unconscionable toll on the family structure of the working class. 是claim 第一个人说因为F超前 所以是好作家 第二个人The mark of a great writer is the ability to move people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be among the first to grasp a social issue. 反驳了第一个人的claim 说不一定超前就是判定一个好作家的标准 个人理解
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2012-2-7 10:12:10
收藏
收藏
楼主