- UID
- 699376
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-12-6
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
The following was written as a part of an application for a small-business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe. “Jazz music is extremely popular in the city of Monroe: over 100000 people attended Monroe’s annual jazz festival last summer, and the highest-rated radio program in Monroe is ‘Jazz Nightly,’ which airs every weeknight. Also, a number of well-known jazz musicians own homes in Monroe. Nevertheless, the nearest jazz club is over an hour away. Given the popularity of jazz in Monroe and a recent nationwide study indicating that the typical jazz fan spends close to $1000 per year on jazz entertainment, a jazz music club in Monroe would be tremendously profitable.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and /or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
In this application, the argument concludes that opening a jazz music club in M would be profitable. To support this conclusion, the author claim that Jazz music is popular in M by relying on the facts that (1) over 100000 people during last summer went to M's annual Jazz festival and (2) that some Jazz musicians own homes in M, and (3) the nearest Jazz club is over an hour away .However, close scrutiny of each of these evidence, reveals that each of them lends little credible support to the conclusions. First of all, the author assumes that the number of people attended M's Jazz festival last summer would strongly indicate the popularity of Jazz music in the city of M. Yet, this assumption is unwarranted. It is entirely possible that the lower ticket's price of Jazz festival last summer attract people to attend. For that matter, perhaps many people who attended the Jazz festival are actually no interested in Jazz music. In short, without considering and ruling out other possible circumstances, I remain unconvincing that Jazz music is popular in M, let alone that opening a Jazz music club in M would be profitable. Secondly, several Jazz musicians own homes in M do not necessarily indicate that Jazz music is popular in this region where their houses located. Perhaps these musicians only have houses here rather than live here. Even if they live in M, they might not play Jazz music because of considering that it would cause noisy of fans after playing Jazz music, while their preference of quiet living environment in M. In either event, the author could not justifiably rely on the mere fact that the homes musicians own in M to support the claim that Jazz music in M is popular. In the third place, the author assumes that over an hour away to the nearest Jazz club results in the increasing profits of Jazz music club in M. However, absent evidence is offered to substantiate this assumption. Perhaps the people who came to the nearest club love its service and atmosphere, despite it takes long time to there. It is equally possible that the new Jazz club in M could not attract people who live in M. Given these possible scenarios, the recommendation would no be taken seriously. Finally, the argument assumes that consuming trend of Jazz music in M reflects the national trend. Yet no clear evidences are provided to approve this assumption. Lacking such evidence it is entirely possible that jazz fan in M spends little money per year on jazz entertainment. Thus, without more information about people's spending on jazz entertainment of M, it is unreasonable to draw any conclusions about jazz music club in M would be profitable. In summary, the argument is unpersuasive as it stands. To solidify it, the author must provide more convincing evidence that jazz music is popular in M and that as a result opening a jazz music club would be profitable. |
|