ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3043|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

D怎么不对呢?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-8-14 12:04:00 | 只看该作者

D怎么不对呢?

In any negotiations between a party with limited aims and an opposing party with unlimited  aims, the party with limited aims is bound to lose. This is so because the scope of a negotiating party's aims determines the energy and the perseverance that will be brought to the negotiations by that party.


which of the following is an assumption implicit in the passage above?


A) the intensity with which parties conduct negotiations affects the outcome of those negotiations


D)a negotiatior who has exceptionally high aims needs exceptional perseverance in order to avoid losing.


正确答案A我认同,但是我觉得D也可以啊!  \


请大家教教我啊!在此万分感谢!

沙发
发表于 2004-8-15 23:59:00 | 只看该作者

1。原文的GAP是:the energy and the perseverance 和结果。D并没填补这个GAP

2。原文说的是AIM的SCOPE,并非HIGH。是范围,不是深度。

3。D中的exceptionally,原文只需the energy and the perseverance 和结果的一般关系,并不需要exceptionally的关系

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-16 21:08:00 | 只看该作者
哦,谢谢这位大哥拉.但是好细哦,我根本没有注意的太细致哦!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-9 15:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部