【每日阅读训练第二期——速度越障4系列】【4-16】

shelvey

周末咯，放假咯，梵高先生要回归咯，吼吼！！
今天的速度训练部分是龙应台女士（台湾）上月在香港大学李嘉诚医学院第１００年毕业礼的毕业演讲词；龙应台女士在这篇演讲词背后花了大量的汗水和时间，还有人文的视角，令演讲词精采得叫人击节赞赏。先附上全文， 有兴趣的队友们可以把自由阅读读完，虽然有点长，但这类演讲文对咱考G的人来说基本没有难度吧。
速度：
The Village we come from
Professor Lung Ying Tai
Graduation Address
LKS Medical College
University of Hong Kong
Nov. 28, 2011
速度一【字数：281】
Members of the faculty, distinguished guests, proud parents, and graduates:
I am most reluctant in giving graduation addresses because the given audience is usually the worst kind--before you open your mouth, they wish you were already done, and whatever you say, they are determined that they won't remember a thing once they are out of the hall.
Under these tough circumstances, I still have to say that it's not only an honor and pleasure for me to be here with you today; it's also a calculated pre-emptive measure because sooner or later, one way or another, I am going to fall into your hands. And when our paths do cross, I naturally would hope that you are not only professionally excellent but also socially committed and compassionate.
Today is the graduation ceremony for your Study Phase I, medicine, and it's also the inauguration ceremony for your Study Phase II, the study of life. So I'd like to share with you some of my own notes about life.
I grew up in a port city in southern Taiwan called Kaohsiung. In 1961, when I was in the 2nd grade, something happened to my class. A girl vomited so violently that she had to be taken to the hospital. Very soon we were told to go home; all schools were shut down indefinitely. When we came back to the classroom some days later, several seats were empty. That was the first time I heard of the disease called "cholera." Of course I didn't know that our neighboring "village," Hong Kong, was hit by the same epidemic that year and 15 people died from it. We are much more connected than we know.
速度二【字数：322】
I was a child of the so-called "third world." Imagine these snapshots in black and white: young mothers spent all day piecing together plastic flowers and cheap Christmas lights in the crammed living rooms while their children ran around with T-shirts sewn together from sacks in which milk powder had been transported as American aid; printed over the chest of a child might happen to be the picture of two masculine hands engaged in a shake, with the caption, "China-US Cooperation," or "net weight 20 pounds." One of the major surprises I had when I arrived in the US for my graduate studies in 1975 was to discover that the milk people were drinking was not made from dried powder. In my class of 1961, nearly every girl had head lice in her hair—the tiny white eggs of the lice sticking to the hair look like dandruff, and oftentimes you would see a schoolteacher holing up a can of DDT, a synthetic insecticide, spraying at the head a crouched girl.
Hong Kong people of my generation have very similar memories of their past. Milk powder and cheap Christmas lights, cholera and head lice were all footprints of poverty. And if we go one or two generations further back, the pictures would be even bleaker. A Western missionary who arrived in China in 1895 described what she saw on the streets: "Everywhere are people whose skin have festering sores, people whose thyroid gland was so overblown that they couldn't walk straight; everywhere are the deformed, the blind and beggars of incredible shapes and forms."
A Japanese writer called Ohashi Otowa visited Hong Kong in 1900. By chance he stepped into a hospital and caught sight of a sickroom: "I peeped into an ill-lit room and saw a lowly Chinaman lying on a bare board wriggling like a maggot. It was so filthy and the stench so penetrating that we took immediate flight."
速度三【字数：320】
But why am I telling you this? Why am I telling you this on this particular day, for this particular occasion, at this particular place?
I have my reasons.
You are the centenary graduates of the University of Hong Kong, which was built on the foundation of the Hong Kong College of Medicine for Chinese established in 1887. Keep in mind that in 1887, post-mortem examination was still considered by most Chinese as a sacrilege, an offense, if not a crime; keep in mind that in 1897 when Lu Xun's father was fatally ill, the local doctor's prescription for him was to find a pair of crickets, which must be "yuan pei" —a pair from first mating. Only in this historical context you come to realize that the founding of the Hong Kong College of Medicine 124 years ago was a ground-breaking, epoch-making milestone and the people who made it possible must have been people with a tremendous sense of commitment and, above all, with the power of vision. It's people like Ho Kai and Patrick Manson who paved the way for you to arrive in this hall today.
On October 1, 1887, the inauguration ceremony for the Hong Kong College of Medicine took place and its first Dean, Dr. Patrick Manson, who is still revered today as the founder of the tropical medicine field, gave the address. This medical college, he predicted, will offer an opportunity for Hong Kong "to become a center and distributor, not for merchandise only, but also for science." Looking at the freshmen amongst the audience, he added, "The old Greek cities used to boast of their great men, and claim them with jealous care. Let us hope that in the new and greater China of the future, when the learned dispute of their great men, not a few may be claimed for Hong Kong and for the school today inaugurated."
速度四【字数：304】
Among the 30 some students inaugurated in 1887, only 2 graduated, in 1892. One became a country doctor in Malaysia, and the other, thinking that "healing men" is not as important as "curing the country," gave up the medical profession for something else.
Originally, when Sun Yat Sen was still a student in Hong Kong, he had in mind only a very modest project. So impressed by the modern management of this colony, he intended to carve out a Hong Kong "on small scale" out of his hometown, Heungshan. The young man began to build a road with shovel and pickax, hoping that it would connect his own village with the next. Only when this small project failed due to local corruption, he turned to something bigger—he overthrew the Chinese empire.
From Manson's inauguration address of 1887 to this graduation speech of 2011, our lives—yours and mine--have been changed by many extraordinary people. Some men of vision transformed education; some men of action started a revolution and founded a new nation; some men and women with perseverance and intelligence created vaccines or provided cure--small pox and rinderpest are eradicated, malaria is largely eliminated, cholera is under control, and most school girls of Taiwan and Hong Kong today do not know what head lice are. 124 years down the road, this medical college of the University of Hong Kong, which began with the daring dream of a handful of people, is turning out some of the best scientists and professionals shaping the future of the global community.
And you are part and parcel of this heritage. However, if so much has been accomplished by your "village elders" like Patrick Manson and Sun Yat Sen, is there anything left for your generation, for you, to dream, to dare, to devote yourselves to?
速度五【字数：348】
I think yes, there is.
Before the 43-year-old Dr. Manson decided to help found the Hong Kong School of Medicine, he had studied his place and time. The place was Hong Kong, where health care for the local population was in a miserable state. The time was late Ching, when old structures had begun to crumble and new values had not been formed. Sun Yat Sen was 26 when he graduated from this college but decided to make the country his patient. He studied medicine, he walked the streets of this colony, and he pondered upon the maladies of the nation, looking for remedies.
So what is your place and time? First let us look at who you are. About 20% of you, the medical students of HKU, come from families with either parents or one of the parents being healthcare professionals-- doctors, nurses, CM practitioners. Close to 60% of you come from families with a post-secondary education. It is pretty safe to say that you are, or will be, the elite of the society.
But exactly what kind of society do you find yourselves in?
There is something very "unique" about this "village" you belong to. In a city of 7 million people with an average per capita income of nearly US$30,000, 1.2 million people live below the poverty line. If that sounds abstract, try stand on a corner of Bonham Street and count the children who walk by--one, two, three, four--one out of every four children in this glamorous city live in poverty.
And have you ever paid attention to those elderly women who are pushing heavily loaded trolleys up the steep hills in Central? In this society, nearly 40% of the elderly fall below the poverty line. When visitors arrive at the airport, they immediately see an attractive slogan: "World City of Asia." What's not spelled out in that slogan is that income equality of this city is the worst in Asia, worse than India or Mainland China, and the wealth gap here ranks the biggest among all developed economies in the world.
自由阅读
This society that you and I have membership of is probably the easiest place in the world for a photographer to find a spot on any street and he can catch the moment when a Rolls Royce or a Bentley happens to be driving by an elderly man who is scavenging a garbage bin.
I am not suggesting that you should follow Lu Xun and turn to radical writing, or emulate Sun Yat Sen and engage in politics or become social workers. Life offers too many interesting as well as surprising possibilities. But as centenary graduates of this institution of such important heritage, you might consider spending more thoughts on where you have come from and where you may choose to go. The first stone of the road was laid down 124 years ago with the hope to connect to the next village, which is where you are today. Patrick Manson fought against ignorance and insisted on learning; Sun Yat Sen fought against corruption and insisted on good governance; as the torch relay continues, what will you fight against, and what will you insist on?
I hope you don't have ready answers for me, because if you do, I would be suspicious. What one fights against and what one insists on, taken in its totality, are called personal beliefs. Personal beliefs are not declared. They are practiced in the minute details of life. They are revealed in the smallest decisions of daily routine.
Patrick Manson later worked as advisor to the Colonial Office in London and his main job was to examine recruits and select those who are physically fit for jobs in the tropics. An unexpected problem arose, that is, he discovered that more than 90% of the applicants for subordinate positions such as railroad workers had bad teeth, which by regulation should disqualify them. He had to make a decision what to do.
Manson wrote to the Colonial Office: "To reject these would amount to almost wholesale rejection of all men of their class." He therefore suggested that the government provide dental care for those who couldn't afford it. Some professionals would see decayed teeth just as decayed teeth, but some others, people like Manson, would see things on the existential level--he sees human plight. And it's small, banal decisions such as this that make us what we truly are.
My family moved to a fishing village when I was 14. We were so poor that, when the children got sick, my mother would not dare to go to a clinic. One day, my youngest brother had a fever so high and coughed so badly that my mother was forced to go to the village doctor. We all went--four children of different age and height stood face to face with this very quiet man. He hardly spoke, and when he did speak, with a very soft voice, it was either Japanese or the Fukien dialect, which we could not understand a word of. He checked the little boy, pressed the medicine into my mother's hand, coached her in the unintelligible language how to care for the young, and refused to accept fees. And thereafter, throughout our childhood, he declined any fees from us.
That was my very first memory of a doctor's visit. The room was barely furnished but extremely clean and outside the room was a small courtyard, glittering with afternoon sunshine, and I could smell the scent of the summer jasmine in full bloom.
I wish you success and happiness, and thank you all.
越障：
Space invaders
LAS VEGAS is a city of fast bucks, fast food and fast marriages. It could also be the place where a long war was declared. On January 10th Paul Otellini, the boss of Intel, will address the International Consumer Electronics Show (CES), a vast gathering of gadget-makers, sellers and aficionados in Sin City. He will introduce a phalanx of products showcasing the chips the world’s largest semiconductor company most wants to hype.
Up on the stage with Mr Otellini will be not just PCs of the sort that the company has powered for decades, but also new slimline PCs known as “ultrabooks”, which are being made by the likes of Toshiba and Hewlett-Packard (HP), and even a couple of smartphones. They represent the front-line of an army of Intel-powered kit going into battle against smartphones and tablets which use processors based on designs from ARM, a British firm.
Intel and ARM, pretty much as different in size and approach as competitors can be, have carved up most of the world of microprocessors—the most lucrative bit of the $313 billion global semiconductor market—between them. Each has a well defined patch in which it is pre-eminent. Intel bestrides the market for the microprocessors at the heart of PCs and servers like a colossus; ARM’s legions hold sway in the wide open spaces of the mobile market, having expanded without hindrance from their home turf in mobile phones to the booming world of tablets. Neither side has shown the stomach for more than the occasional raid into the other’s domain.
The wares on show at CES provide the clearest indication yet that Intel is escalating hostilities. It is trying to break into the rapidly growing smartphone market (it already makes chips for some tablets). ARM, meanwhile, has set its sights on the server business, where its low-energy chips should appeal to customers worried about high electricity bills. And more of its processors are likely to find their way into PCs in the coming years too.
The battle is not just about dividing up territories already occupied; it is also about finding new lands to conquer. Both firms are keen to stake claims on the largely uncolonised and still somewhat notional terrain known as the “internet of things”: the myriad processors in industrial machinery, consumer goods and infrastructure, ever more of which will communicate with each other and with distant computers. Cisco, a giant American maker of networking gear, estimates that by 2015 there may be almost 15 billion internet-connected devices, up from 7.5 billion in 2010. Whereas the market for more phones and other personal computing devices is limited by the number of persons the planet has to offer, things, being more numerous than people, provide a lot more long-term room for growth.
Intel, founded in Silicon Valley in 1968, is responsible for many of the advances that have made today’s semiconductors possible. It employs almost 100,000 people and mints money. In the first nine months of last year, the company generated $40.1 billion in revenue and $13.2 billion in pre-tax profit. Admittedly, in December it cut its revenue forecast for the fourth quarter of 2011 by 7%, to $13.4 billion-14 billion, because floods in Thailand had disrupted the production of hard-disk drives and hence demand for its chips. But that was a hiccup; Intel has no real rival in the market for chips that power PCs and servers. Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), the distant second in both, has been struggling. It replaced its chief executive in August after a seven-month search and laid off 1,400 workers in November.
Empire and foundry-nation
Intel’s business has been inextricably entwined with the steady fall in the cost of processing-power known as Moore’s Law, which is named after one of the company’s founders. Ever better chips mean ever increasing sales, which mean ever more money with which to build ever better factories for ever better chips.
The firm’s top brass attributes much of the company’s success in harnessing this virtuous circle to the fact that it both designs and makes its chips, with ten chip factories (“fabs” in industry argot) operating and two more under construction. Brian Krzanich, Intel’s manufacturing head, says this means it can bring chips to market faster and with fewer faults than rivals who use external firms, known as “foundries”, to make their chips. This helps explain why it dominates the market for high-performance processors in PCs and servers.
ARM’s chips are, by contrast, designed to economise on energy rather than to maximise processing power. And it makes none itself, instead selling licences for its semiconductor designs or its “architecture” (a recipe from which licensees make their own designs). Licensees pay a fee and a royalty of 1-2% per chip.
In essence, ARM provides a development base on which others build. The costs are shared, as are the resulting revenues and profits. ARM expects to recoup a chip’s development costs from the sale of the first ten licences. Royalties, which flow later, make up just over half its revenues.
Next to Intel’s leviathan, ARM is a shrimp. It employs just 2,000 people. It reported revenues in the first nine months of last year of £354m, or $568m, on which it made a pre-tax profit of £107.3m (see table). But it lies at the heart of a huge “ecosystem” of companies: a federation, perhaps, as opposed to Intel’s integrated empire. It has 270-odd licensees with 830 licences. Between them they shifted perhaps 8 billion ARM-based semiconductors in 2011, half of them in mobile phones and mobile computers, the other half embedded in consumer items and elsewhere. According to IDC, a research firm, the market for PC-powering chips that use Intel’s x86 processor architecture, which Intel dominates, was about 400m last year.
The ARM federation comprises not only chipmakers but also designers of chipmaking tools, devicemakers and software companies. ARM uses collective insights to design chips it thinks its partners will need; and they in turn shape their products with ARM’s processors in mind.
The dead past
There are intense rivalries within the federation, for example between NVIDIA and Qualcomm, leading makers of graphics chips. And the dividing line between federation and empire is not always clear. Design-tool firms such as Cadence Design Systems and Synopsys work with both ARM and Intel. So do Microsoft, HP, Apple and others. Intel itself is an ARM licensee. But that is for the most part because those businesses straddle the divide, not because the divide is not there.
ARM’s impressive position in the mobile-device market was born out of what seemed at the time like a string of failures. In the 1980s, when the trend in chip design was to make the hardware on processors capable of ever more varied and subtle types of calculation, Acorn, a then-marginal and now-defunct British computer-maker, had a niche in designing chips good at carrying out only a few types of calculation, but which did so very quickly. This reduced-instruction-set computing (RISC) approach requires software that can make up for the limitations of the chips, but uses less power than other approaches.

到这里已经1000多字的，就到此为止把。。。整篇文章3000字够呛。。。。。
~~~~~~~~~~~~昏~~割~~线~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
自由阅读：
In 1990 Apple, struggling itself, needed a chip for its Newton, a personal digital assistant that was to restore the company’s fortunes. It liked Acorn’s chip designs: the two formed Advanced RISC Machines as a joint venture with a chipmaker. The Newton was a flop, and Acorn was wound up in 1999—the year that ARM floated. Apple, which today has a cash pile of $81 billion, sold its 43% stake because it needed the money.
When the mobile-phone market took off, ARM’s parsimonious processors were ideal for products in which battery life is at a premium and high-power chips and the fans that cool them are therefore not an option. Today more than 95% of the world’s mobile phones contain an ARM-based chip. Tudor Brown, ARM’s president and one of its founders, adds that the shift to “systems on a chip”—single bits of silicon that package together not just one or more central-processing cores but also graphics processors and other accoutrements—also helped ARM. Its stripped-down processing cores play well with others.
As mobile phones have become cleverer as well as commoner, ARM has gained again. Cleverer phones use more and pricier processors. The average number of ARM-based chips in a phone went up from 1.5 in 2006 to 2.5 in 2010. NVIDIA’s new Tegra 3 system on a chip for smartphones and tablets contains five ARM cores as well as NVIDIA’s own graphics-processing unit. And more, dearer cores mean more royalties. A smartphone can in the best case bring the company eight times as much in royalties as a basic phone, a tablet computer 11 times as much. This shift is far from over (see chart).
There is no such growth in the market for new PCs, which increasingly depends on the replacement of old computers by new ones with better, but not more numerous, processors, and makes up ever less of the total market for microprocessors. No wonder Intel is desperate for new territory, and willing to fight for it.
It is bringing two powerful siege engines to the field. One is its low-power Atom line of chips. The latest of these, code-named Medfield, is already in production and will almost certainly feature in the phones Mr Otellini shows off at CES. A study by Jefferies, an investment bank, says that Medfield is on a par with several popular ARM chips when it comes to processing bang for the energy buck. And Intel is working with Google to ensure that the search firm’s Android mobile operating system runs smoothly on Atom chips.
The company does not intend to stop there. The width of the circuitry on a Medfield chip is a mere 32 nanometres (nm), or millionths of a millimetre. Using a three-dimensional chip design Intel plans to shrink that even further over the next couple of years, to 22nm and then 14nm, and sell chips that beat the competition on both energy-efficiency and performance.
The wedge
The other thing Intel is counting on to help it succeed is new leadership. In December it put Mike Bell and Hermann Eul in charge of a streamlined internal unit focused on cracking the mobile-device market. Mr Bell, who joined Intel in July 2010 after working at Palm and Apple, says the firm has hired more people with a telecoms background and assembled a team to develop software to help phonemakers get the most out of its chips. Intel has also acquired businesses such as the wireless operation of Germany’s Infineon Technologies to help with systems-on-chips. Mr Bell is confident that combining all this with the company’s manufacturing might will make it a force to be reckoned with. “We can move this army en masse over to our mobile effort,” he says.
But even if the chips prove effective, Intel will be hard put to build a phone business out from its beachhead. Getting processors on a technical par with ARM’s, says Michael Rayfield of NVIDIA, is “the easier of the two hurdles. The software hurdle is staggering.” Firms that have invested in ARM’s silicon-and-software combination will be reluctant to give Intel’s chips a chance until they are sure they can handle all kinds of software applications as smoothly as ARM’s. Intel will also struggle to match the extensive and deep relationships its rivals have in the phone arena. The complex reciprocal relationships that make up ARM’s ecosystem, says Mr Brown, the company’s president, are “probably our biggest barrier to entry”.
The fragmented mobile-device market also requires lots of different system-on-chip configurations, which Intel will find a challenge to match. And makers of tablets and smartphones may be reluctant to commit themselves to an architecture dominated by a single company that makes its own processors. “With ARM, when you are tired of Qualcomm you can go to NVIDIA or another company,” says Linley Gwennap, the boss of the Linley Group, a research firm. “But in Intel’s case, there’s nobody else on its team.”
Birth of a notion
While Intel is mustering its forces to attack the mobile-device business, it also faces an assault on its own redoubts. For years the firm has had an iron grip on the PC arena thanks to Microsoft’s decision to design successive versions of its Windows operating system specifically to run on the x86 architecture. But last year Microsoft said that the next version of Windows, which it wants to look and feel the same on mobile devices as on desktops, will work with ARM chips too—one of a number of cracks in the “Wintel alliance”. This could encourage more firms in the ARM federation to try their luck in the PC market, though Intel’s extensive product lines and deep relationships with PC makers make it very difficult to beat.
ARM itself spies a bigger opportunity in another of Intel’s dominions: servers. The server market is hitching a ride on the spread of smartphones, tablets and other devices. The more data is sent to and from the cloud by them, the more social sites they need endlessly to update, the more servers are required. And the data farms in which these servers sit have a prodigious thirst for electricity, a problem that ARM’s chips were created to solve.
In November HP announced a project ambitiously named Moonshot to develop servers using ARM-architecture chips made by Calxeda, a Texan company of which ARM owns 25%. The chips are less powerful than their Intel equivalents. But they are less thirsty and need less cooling, so whereas a standard rack (a man-high cabinet with about a cubic metre of volume) in a data centre can only house a few hundred Intel server chips, Calxeda thinks it can cram in almost 3,000. With 100 racks in a hall, “you’re talking megawatts” with normal servers, says David Chalmers of HP. Moonshot is designed to use a tenth of the power of current server systems and cost 60% less.
Moonshot and other low-energy servers could appeal to, say, social media companies and other web-based firms which do not need to carry out very complicated processing—which benefits from the architectures of more complex chips—or to do it very fast. But Reuben Miller of IDC thinks this segment is likely to be no more than 10-12% of the overall server market by 2015. And ARM’s share of even that smallish slice may be modest to begin with. Just as phonemakers are used to things working in an ARM-ish way, most server software is written for Intel’s chips, and reaps the benefits of its 64-bit architecture, which makes accessing lots of memory, among other things, much easier. ARM’s architecture uses a 32-bit standard, and though the company recently unveiled a 64-bit version, no chips making use of it are yet available. Until they are, says Warren East, the firm’s chief executive, “we can’t even address probably 75% of the server market.”
Meanwhile Intel isn’t standing still: its investment in more energy-efficient processors, such as those of the Atom line, can reap benefits in servers as it does elsewhere. HP’s Mr Chalmers, happy to work with both sides if it gets his clients the servers they need, expects to announce servers based on Atom chips and something similar from AMD this year.
Each side, then, seems to have defences against the incursions of the other. But that does not mean the war will end in stalemate. Intel is more vulnerable than it looks, for several reasons. One is that despite demand from emerging markets such as China, the PC market is unlikely to grow anywhere near as fast as it has done in the past. Intel’s aggressive promotion of ultrabooks seems like a somewhat desperate attempt to inject excitement into a category that has lost momentum.
What is more, the well-fortified world of Wintel provided the PC market with relatively juicy margins. In smartphones and tablets Intel will find itself in a much more brutal competitive environment in which the advantages of its integrated approach to design and manufacturing may well be outweighed by those of agile competitors used to servicing a wide range of companies with lots of different products.
The chips, like dust
Another big test for Intel will be the small but fast-growing market for embedded chips—the sensors and microcontrollers which will, as they become able to talk to each other, make up the “internet of things”. Renesas Electronics, a Japanese company, holds the largest fief in this fragmented terrain. ARM also has a worthwhile chunk of it. But it is a lawless and fragmented territory, largely served by in-house designs and software that both Intel and ARM see as ripe for replacement.
In 2009 Intel splashed out $884m on Wind River, a firm that specialises in software for things that you might not expect to need any, in order to give its efforts in the embedded-chip market a fillip. It has since been able to ink deals with car companies, makers of digital signage and other firms that put chips into their various wares. The company says that annual revenues from embedded-chip sales are now running at $1.5 billion, and it expects these to grow by 25% in each of the next three years.
Yet ARM’s flexible business model, allowing for lots of different chips for different applications, and its happiness in lower-margin businesses, may well give its federation an edge in this business too. Its long experience of producing low-energy chips should be another advantage. Tiny embedded processors “will not use huge amounts of processing power, but power consumption will become more and more critical,” says Ganesh Ramamoorthy of Gartner, a research and consulting firm. ARM already makes a quarter of its revenue from embedded chips. And for the newer embedded processors in what the company calls the Cortex-M family, nine-tenths of the licences so far sold have yet to lead to products, and thus royalties. Having your own fabs can be handy. But when it comes to invading virgin territory quickly, having lots of allies to help you is absolutely fabulous.

铁板神猴

抢沙发！

计时：
1'38''
1'55''
1'53''
1'36''
2'07''
3'40''
说的是医德！很不错~

balapupu

为了证明我还健在~~占座！

shelvey

啊~刚发的帖~~我板凳都没了~~
160 100%
146  90%
160  80%
193 70%
197  90%
啊啊啊。。。不练就是这种结果！！！

whitethelittle

梵高的沙发果然值钱啊，连地板都没有

myancamel

234 50%
180 50%
209 70%
243 70%
231 70%

介绍intel的展览
进而介绍Intel
讲intel的战略
介绍intel和AMD的竞争
一个是在PC为主，一个以mobile为主
但双方都想进入对方的领域
不但如此，在互联网世界，他们都在开阔新的疆土
介绍Intel的各种数字，销售额
今年的业绩，因为泰国受灾有一些影响
但十个厂仍像是一个帝国
AMD数字小很多，像是一个小虾米
但是一个federal，一个联盟，靠license授权
这个联盟内部竞争也很激烈
举例在图像处理领域等

铁板神猴

LS是怎么判断自己的阅读理解百分比的~？

shelvey

LS是怎么判断自己的阅读理解百分比的~？

-- by 会员 铁板神猴 (2012/1/6 23:54:57)

估的吧。。。
我想知道怎样网页上字数统计的，用word好麻烦，还要复制黏贴的。。。。

shelvey

梵高的沙发果然值钱啊，连地板都没有

-- by 会员 whitethelittle (2012/1/6 22:52:22)

哈哈，今天估计是群里嗨爆了~~~

半个世界下雨

1‘26
2’00
1‘40
1’50
读过龙应台的《亲爱的安德烈》，很喜欢的作家。今天这一篇也很喜欢~