- UID
- 779686
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-7-11
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
1.
Psychiatrist: Take any visceral emotion you care to consider. There are always situations in which it is healthy to try to express that emotion. So, there are always situations in which it is healthy to try to express one’s anger.
The conclusion reveals that there are always situations in which it is healthy to try to express one’s anger. However, “anger” has not been provided in the argument. So the right answer should be related to “anger”, and comply with other premises. The conclusion of the argument follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?
(A) Anger is always expressible.
This answer choice cannot strengthen the argument, since “expressible” cannot fill the hole in the logic chain. (B) Anger is a visceral emotion.
Yes, it points out the leap, and make the logic chain valid. BA (C) Some kinds of emotions are unhealthy to express.
It does not refer to “anger”. (D) All emotions that are healthy to express are visceral.
The same to C. (E) An emotion is visceral only if it is healthy to express.
The same to C.
45. (33087-!-item-!-188;#058&007558) The recent decline in the value of the dollar was triggered by a prediction of slower economic growth in the coming year. But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government's huge budget deficit, which must therefore be decreased to prevent future currency declines.
In order to weaken the conclusion, we should prove that preventing the future currency declines is not caused by government’s huge budget deficit. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion about how to prevent future currency declines? (A) The government has made little attempt to reduce the budget deficit.
Actually, this would strengthen the conclusion. (B) The budget deficit has not caused a slowdown in economic growth.
Shell Game: a slowdown in economic growth is not equal to the future currency declines. (C) The value of the dollar declined several times in the year prior to the recent prediction of slower economic growth.
But we do not know whether the government’s huge budget deficit can cause the decline in the value of the dollar. (D) Before there was a large budget deficit, predictions of slower economic growth frequently caused declines in the dollar's value.
Yes, it weakens the conclusion by showing that before the cause is present, the effect occurs. BA (E) When there is a large budget deficit, other events in addition to predictions of slower economic growth sometimes trigger declines in currency value.
It cannot rule out the cause, so it does not weaken the conclusion.
46. (33135-!-item-!-188;#058&007559) Neither a rising standard of living nor balanced trade, by itself, establishes a country's ability to compete in the international marketplace. Both are required simultaneously since standards of living can rise because of growing trade deficits and trade can be balanced by means of a decline in a country's standard of living. If the facts stated in the passage above are true, a proper test of a country's ability to be competitive is its ability to (A) balance its trade while its standard of living rises
Yes, both of them are needed simultaneously. BA (B) balance its trade while its standard of living falls
The standard of living should rise. (C) increase trade deficits while its standard of living rises
The trade deficits should be balanced. (D) decrease trade deficits while its standard of living falls
The standard of living should rise. (E) keep its standard of living constant while trade deficits rise
The trade deficits should be balanced.
47. (33183-!-item-!-188;#058&007560) Traditionally, decision-making by managers that is reasoned step-by-step has been considered preferable to intuitive decision-making. However, a recent study found that top managers used intuition significantly more than did most middle- or lower-level managers. This confirms the alternative view that intuition is actually more effective than careful, methodical reasoning.
Please note the conclusion, which reveals that intuition is more effective than careful, methodical reasoning. However, there is no evidence in the argument to demonstrate that something is more effective than something else. We can only find that top managers used intuition significantly more than did most middle-or lower-level managers. So the right answer should fill the hole. The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions? (A) Methodical, step-by-step reasoning is inappropriate for making many real-life management decisions.
Something is inappropriate is irrelevant. (B) Top managers have the ability to use either intuitive reasoning or methodical, step-by-step reasoning in making decisions.
It seems to be a contender. However, the author has considered readers know this, and it cannot be the assumption to make the conclusion valid. (C) The decisions made by middle- and lower-level managers can be made as easily by using methodical reasoning as by using intuitive reasoning.
It cannot strengthen the conclusion. (D) Top managers use intuitive reasoning in making the majority of their decisions.
Actually, this answer choice has been referred in the argument. (E) Top managers are more effective at decision-making than middle- or lower-level managers.
Yes, this comparison makes the conclusion much more valid, thus strengthening the argument. BA
48. (33231-!-item-!-188;#058&007563) Certain messenger molecules fight damage to the lungs from noxious air by telling the muscle cells encircling the lungs' airways to contract. This partially seals off the lungs. An asthma attack occurs when the messenger molecules are activated unnecessarily, in response to harmless things like pollen or household dust. Which of the following, if true, points to the most serious flaw of a plan to develop a medication that would prevent asthma attacks by blocking receipt of any messages sent by the messenger molecules referred to above?
(A) Researchers do not yet know how the body produces the messenger molecules that trigger asthma attacks.
Actually, we can know this process from the argument. (B) Researchers do not yet know what makes one person's messenger molecules more easily activated than another's.
The comparison is irrelevant. (C) Such a medication would not become available for several years, because of long lead times in both development and manufacture.
But it can still come true. (D) Such a medication would be unable to distinguish between messages triggered by pollen and household dust and messages triggered by noxious air.
Yes, if this happened, the lung would be harmed by noxious air. BA (E) Such a medication would be a preventative only and would be unable to alleviate an asthma attack once it had started.
This answer choice actually points some weaknesses of such a medication. However, it can be a preventative, it may still be effective.
|
|