逻辑题求教

epithumia

逻辑一问

For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be oulawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.

(A)  Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.

(B)  Where strikes by all categories of public-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitute for the services of those workers are available.

(C)  Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.

(D)  Most categories of public-workers have no counterparts in the private sector.

(E)   A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from an arbitrator.

选(C)

本身题目意思就不是很清楚了，麻烦各位大牛解惑。

epithumia

sorry

I forgot to post the question.

The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?