ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2106|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

逻辑题请教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-29 20:12:00 | 只看该作者

逻辑题请教

新东方逻辑单册 Section One, Question 13


While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state's budget has increased by an average of 6 percent each year. While the previous governor was in office, the state's budget increased by 11/2 percent each year. Obviously, the austere budgets during Governor Verdant's term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending.


Answer:


A. The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governor's term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdent's term


我怎么看不懂题目啊,Governor Verdent任期内预算增加为6%,前任任期内预算增加为5.5%,怎么就Governor Verdant's term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending?


答案是A,我能理解,但总觉得理解得不透彻,谁能具体讲解一下其中的关系?


谢谢!

沙发
发表于 2004-7-29 20:48:00 | 只看该作者
这样的问题无法回答,请贴出全题以及问话!
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-7-29 21:27:00 | 只看该作者

刚才着急出去吃饭,真是不好意思,漏了一段话:

新东方逻辑单册 Section One, Question 13

While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state's budget has increased by an average of 6 percent each year. While the previous governor was in office, the state's budget increased by 11/2 percent each year. Obviously, the austere budgets during Governor Verdant's term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?

Correct Answer:

A. The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governor's term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdent's term

我看不懂题目啊,Governor Verdent任期内预算增加为6%,前任任期内预算增加为5.5%,怎么就Governor Verdant's term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending?

答案是A,我能理解,但总觉得理解得不透彻,谁能具体讲解一下其中的关系?

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-7-29 21:48:00 | 只看该作者
5#
发表于 2004-7-29 22:03:00 | 只看该作者

呵呵,原来是问weaken呀,刚才看了半天我也不明白“Governor Verdent任期内预算增加为6%,前任任期内预算增加为5.5%,怎么就Governor Verdant's term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending?”

看了选项我就明白了。选项说前任的inflation比V的高,而且6%高于inflation的3%,所以V政府的钱应该是incease 而不是slowdown,所以weaken。

6#
发表于 2004-7-29 22:10:00 | 只看该作者
这是假设型的WEAKEN。原文推理中假设通货膨胀率也一样越来越高,扣除通货膨胀,0.5%的预算增长不算高。E否定了这个假设。说通货膨胀其实是变低了。
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-7-29 23:02:00 | 只看该作者
多谢了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-30 12:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部