ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1830|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-3-4

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-22 01:18:00 | 只看该作者

大全-3-4

m-3-4.People living in the undeveloped wilderness area want jobs, and commercial development of the area will create jobs. But if the new commercial development plan is carried out, the wilderness will suffer. Thus the board considering the area’s future must choose between the preservation of the wilderness and the wishes of the local people.



The answer to which of the following questions would be LEAST relevant to evaluating whether the board indeed faces the choice the author says it faces?



(A) Could commercial development be carried out under an alternative plan without damaging the wilderness?



(B) Would commercial development of the wilderness area significantly benefit people living elsewhere?


(C) Would the jobs created by the new development plan be filled by the local people?



(D) Do local people support or oppose commercial development of the wilderness area?


(E) Can job be provided without commercial development of the wilderness area?




这种answer题老是做错,不知是怎么回事。大家有好的建议吗?


我选的A,我觉得一个代替的方案即可以development又不damage wilderness 的话,那board不就可以不用面对选择了吗?


请指正



沙发
发表于 2004-7-22 08:29:00 | 只看该作者

MM,这里问的是LEAST relevant,那么就是最不能用于eveluate题干的选项。

那么就是说A可以用来eveluate啊。

所以只有B说:这种商业发展能使其他地方的人受益吗?最风马牛不想干,属于out of scope,题目根本不考虑其它地方的人。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-7-23 02:14:00 | 只看该作者

呵呵,我又在题目上出错,真是丢死人啦!

要回去苦练阅读啦

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-16 08:35
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部