ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2597|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

此ARGUE有什么可以攻击的?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-10-19 20:26:56 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.
"Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with children living in the group of islands that includes Tertia show that these children spend much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. This research of mine proves that Dr. Field's conclusion about Tertian village culture is invalid and thus that the observation-centered approach to studying cultures is invalid as well. The interview-centered method that my team of graduate students is currently using in Tertia will establish a much more accurate understanding of child-rearing traditions there and in other island cultures."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
我想到的点不多,希望大家多给点想法反驳
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-10-19 22:18:50 | 只看该作者
这篇有人写过,还有几个提纲,你看看这个。
http://forum.chasedream.com/GRE_Prep/thread-592873-1-1.html
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 04:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部