每日一听 60-second-science 《听写营》

铁板神猴

嘿嘿 Rose也没看懂 顿时来兴趣了~
回去看了下上下文，发现之前语法分析错了……

规范点应该是",which would explain why explain A, except S be B, not C"，典型从句套从句。
其中which指代前面的"近sun快速，远sun慢速"的特点，引导出后面整个“why”从句，why从句里是"explain A,except that"从句，that里面是个S be B, not C的从句。加上which之前的内容，这是个整体4从句嵌套在一起的结构！！

我觉得是这样，except是“除此之外”的意思。理解如下。
......,which would explain why summer seems to zip by, except the seasons are a function of the tilt of the earth’s axis, not its different distances from the sun.
blablabla...而这就解释了为何夏天总是感觉很快地经过，除了（这个不能解释）季节是由于地轴的倾斜作用造成的，而不是因为地球与太阳之间不同的距离（造成的）。
不同距离就是指，which指代的那个近sun远sun的规律

ashlie888

嘿嘿 Rose也没看懂 顿时来兴趣了~
回去看了下上下文，发现之前语法分析错了……

规范点应该是",which would explain why explain A, except S be B, not C"，典型从句套从句。
其中which指代前面的"近sun快速，远sun慢速"的特点，引导出后面整个“why”从句，why从句里是"explain A,except that"从句，that里面是个S be B, not C的从句。加上which之前的内容，这是个整体4从句嵌套在一起的结构！！

我觉得是这样，except是“除此之外”的意思。理解如下。
......,which would explain why summer seems to zip by, except the seasons are a function of the tilt of the earth’s axis, not its different distances from the sun.
blablabla...而这就解释了为何夏天总是感觉很快地经过，除了（这个不能解释）季节是由于地轴的倾斜作用造成的，而不是因为地球与太阳之间不同的距离（造成的）。
不同距离就是指，which指代的那个近sun远sun的规律

-- by 会员 铁板神猴 (2011/11/17 22:05:51)

小猴子，佩服，佩服。。。解释得很清楚呀。。。终于明白了！~~你的长难句果然很棒的说！赞一个。。
最近在用有道复习单词，每次刚复习完再点回去看，总会有几十个蹦出来，你也是这样的吗？

ashlie888

今天学习记录:
1. 复习有道生词本单词--1h
2. 口语真经一套--1.5h
3. TPO《天文》4篇--1.5h
4. 翻译句子30个---2h
5 阅读TPO12-剩下的两篇完成---1h（做的不是很好，开小差了！）


今天处理了点私事儿。。。新的7天要开始了，最后一个7天！~

selfmotivated

嘿嘿 Rose也没看懂 顿时来兴趣了~
回去看了下上下文，发现之前语法分析错了……

规范点应该是",which would explain why explain A, except S be B, not C"，典型从句套从句。
其中which指代前面的"近sun快速，远sun慢速"的特点，引导出后面整个“why”从句，why从句里是"explain A,except that"从句，that里面是个S be B, not C的从句。加上which之前的内容，这是个整体4从句嵌套在一起的结构！！

我觉得是这样，except是“除此之外”的意思。理解如下。
......,which would explain why summer seems to zip by, except the seasons are a function of the tilt of the earth’s axis, not its different distances from the sun.
blablabla...而这就解释了为何夏天总是感觉很快地经过，除了（这个不能解释）季节是由于地轴的倾斜作用造成的，而不是因为地球与太阳之间不同的距离（造成的）。
不同距离就是指，which指代的那个近sun远sun的规律

-- by 会员 铁板神猴 (2011/11/17 22:05:51)

哈哈...猴子厉害的.好像是这个意思.

selfmotivated

新人来围观+膜拜+学习ing~

-- by 会员 AngelinaSun (2011/11/17 21:22:24)

有空就一起听写吧.

selfmotivated

34.

This is Scientific Americans' 60-Second Science, I'm Steve Mirsky. Got a minute?

The scientific community needs to be involved in promoting science education, including evolution. So says the January issue of the FASEB Journal. FASEB is the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. Sixteen other organizations also signed on to the recommendation, including the National Academy of Sciences and the American Institute of Physics. The article notes that the introduction of nonscience, such as creationism and intelligent design, undermines fundamentals of science education°?such as using the scientific method, understanding how to reach scientific consensus and telling scientific explanations for natural phenomena apart from nonscientific ones.

The article included a survey of a thousand likely US voters. Those able to answer simple questions about plate tectonics, proper antibiotic use and prehistory were far more likely to support evolution education. Said journal editor Gerald Weissman, °∞The bottom line is that the world is round, humans evolved from an extinct species, and Elvis is dead. This survey is a wake-up call for anyone who supports teaching information based on evidence rather than speculation or hope; people want to hear the truth, and they want to hear it from scientists.

Thanks for the minute, for Scientific Americans' 60-Second Science, I'm Steve Mirsky.

selfmotivated

我的听写稿.红色为没听出来部分.
The scientific communityneeds to be involved in promoting science education, including evolution. So says the January issue of the FASEB Journal.FASEB is the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. Sixteenother organizations also signed on to the recommendation, including theNational Academy of Sciences and the American Institute of Physics. The articlenotes that the introduction of nonscience, such as creationismand intelligent design, undermines fundamentals of scienceeducation°?such as using the scientific method, understanding how to reachscientific consensus and telling scientificexplanations for natural phenomena apart fromnonscientific ones.

The article included asurvey of a thousand likely US voters. Those able to answer simple questionsabout plate tectonics, proper antibiotic use andprehistory were far more likely to support evolution education. Said journal editor Gerald Weissman, °∞The bottom line is that the world is round, humans evolvedfrom an extinct species, and Elvis is dead. Thissurvey is a wake-up call for anyone who supports teaching information based onevidence rather than speculation or hope; people wantto hear the truth, and they want to hear it from scientists.(mp3里没有这句.)

铁板神猴

一开始也没读懂 哈哈~ 我发现自己多看了个explain……why和except从句应该是并列的~ 不过意思没错~

TO 小A
有道根据记忆曲线来的，点击过不记得的单词会反复出现。还有一种情况是，背之前只有那些词，背的时间里又有新的词汇要复习了~所以之后出来

总体来说，还是很科学的~因为比杨鹏法还多了个检验记得、不记得的功能~
小A最后7天计划还是很给力的~！加勒个油~~

selfmotivated

35.

This is Scientific American's 60-Second Science. I'm Cynthia Graber. This will just take a minute.

By now we°Øve all heard about the placebo affect:- just by thinking a pill will help cure what ails you, it often does. Well, it turns out doctors sometimes take advantage of the placebo affect. Yes, doctors - at least doctors in Chicago,- occasionally purposely prescribe placebos. That°Øs according to a study in the Journal of General Internal Medicine.

Of 231 internists in Chicago who answered a survey, 45 percent say they°Øve used placebos on occasion. The medicines of choice included antibiotics, vitamins, ibuprofen, and amounts of medication too small to be therapeutic. All prescribed for situations in which those pills shouldn1t have had an effect on the patient°Øs particular complaint.

About a third of the doctors told patients that the pills might help and certainly won°Øt hurt. About 20 percent simply tell them that it°Øs medicine. So even though prescribing placebos remains controversial, clearly some docs are doing it. Decades ago, physicians prescribed placebos to distinguish who had a real problem and who was faking it. Today, they recognize the reality of the mind-body connection, and that placebos can sometimes be just what the doctor ordered.

Thanks for the minute, for Scientific American's 60-Second Science. I'm Cynthia Graber.

selfmotivated

我的听写稿.这篇还比较简单,听完一遍的时候就知道在说什么了.希望考试的时候也能这样.

35

This is ScientificAmerican's 60-Second Science. I'm Cynthia Graber. This will just take a minute.



By now we°Øve all heardabout the placebo affect:- just by thinking apill will help cure what ails you, it oftendoes. Well, it turns out doctors sometimes take advantage of the placeboaffect. Yes, doctors - at least doctors in Chicago,- occasionally purposelyprescribe placebos. That°Øs according to a study in the Journal of GeneralInternal Medicine.



Of 231 internists in Chicago who answered a survey, 45percent say they°Øve used placebos on occasion. The medicines of choiceincluded antibiotics, vitamins, ibuprofen, andamounts of medication too small to be therapeutic.All prescribed for situations in which those pills shouldn1t have had an effecton the patient°Øs particular complaint.



About a thirdof thedoctors told patients that the pills might help and certainly won°Øt hurt.About 20 percent simply tell them that it°Øsmedicine. So even though prescribing placebos remains controversial, clearlysome docs are doing it. Decades ago, physicians prescribed placebos todistinguish who had a real problem and who was faking it. Today, they recognizethe reality of the mind-body connection, and that placebos can sometimes bejust what the doctor ordered.



Thanks for the minute,for Scientific American's 60-Second Science. I'm Cynthia Graber.


Placebo: aharmless pill, medicine, or procedure prescribed more for the psychologicalbenefit to the patient than for any physiological effect
internists : aspecialist in internal medicine.