求证：阅读篇- 城市规划理论和实践

jennifer0148

最近看到篇文章名字叫：How to create a creative city? The viewpoints of Richard Florida and Jane Jacobs。 貌似名字和基金里提到的都很像，请考过的童鞋们来看一下是不是这两个人哦？

jennifer0148

自己顶一个

susliks

你贴出来啊~大家就都看到了阿~

jeffxu

受lz启发，google到了这篇文章。以下贴出部分节选，全文见附件。

The ideas of Richard Florida on creative cities are not entirely novel. In many respects, he builds on the work of America’s well-known urban guru Jane Jacobs. Who are both ‘visionaries of the vital city’? (Hospers, 2003a). To start with Richard Florida: this American academic has been H. John Heinz III professor of Regional Economic Development at the Carnegie Mellon University of Pittsburgh. In July 2004 he moved from Pittsburgh to Washington and started lecturing at George Mason University, Virginia. He has also been a visiting professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard. His book The Rise of the Creative Class was published in 2002. It was an instant bestseller and the prestigious Harvard Business Review has named it one of the breakthrough ideas for 2004. In November 2004 Cities and the Creative Class will be published, the prequel to Rise, consisting of essays, articles and other papers. In March 2005 Florida published The Flight of the Creative Class. The book is dealing with the results ofeconomic globalization and why America, according to him, is losing the competition for talent. After these books on the meso-level (The Rise) and the macro-level (The Flight), Richard Florida intends to focus on the micro-level of the workplace with a third book to be titled The Creative Edge.

Unlike Florida, Jane Jacobs is not in academia. Jacobs may be in her late eighties but she is still as passionate as ever in her study of cities. Trained as a journalist in New York ‘this little old lady in tennis shoes’ now lives in Toronto where she has written a lot on the ‘hustle and bustle’ of cities. Common sense, close observation and personal experience are the factors guiding her investigations. Her first book The Death and Life of Great American Cities (1961) is a real classic and reshaped the way urban planners think about their profession. Over the years Jacobs has elaborated her vision on cities as economic engines in The Economy of Cities (1969) and Cities and the Wealth of Nations (1984). Recently, she has explored the philosophical side of life, searching in her books Systems of Survival (1992), The Nature of Economies (2000) and Dark Age Ahead (2004) for the moral foundations of business and societal life. In these works too, however, she continues to insist on the importance of creative cities for socio-economic development: in the end, she says, it is the unplanned chaos of the urban environment that is the driving force behind our welfare and well-being.

绿巨人

人名没有错的，但你贴的这部分内容应该不是考试文章的主要内容

gloriazjj

UPUPUPUPUPUP~！！

xyxy3238

阅读42和14疑似雷同啊

lynnzhou83

[版本9] by symbolicsmile Q51 V40
(2)4-5段，这一篇特别的长，讲的是建筑文化史。
第一段提到了两个人，Sprand还有Michelle Jackson，第一个人名我不确定，但是第二名字比较确定，因为当时以为自己独到了Michael Jackson还觉得奇怪。这两个人对于21世纪城市建筑的看法。Sprand这个人说城市应该成为attract skilled worker以及relevant businesses的中心，他的说法也是以economic为中心的。但是Michelle就觉得城市应该将某些建筑成为不同人群共同使用的东西，这里强调说Florida是以Michelle的想法来建设城市的，考古的童鞋们可以好好查一查，确定是Florida。
第二段着重讲了Michelle的什么看法。提到了1950s的建筑发展运动，说Michelle的想法是对这些运动的reaction。这些运动忽略了将建筑的用途多样化，但其实这种多样化很重要。
第三段就讲美国的城市开始建造啦，以Michelle这个人的想法为基础，但实际上还是强调了economic factor，忽略了很多人对建筑的需求。
第四段讲了什么忘记了，不好意思。

[版本11] by imfred 760
城市设计那题，Jaccob是基础，他认为城市应该包容多种文化（Cultural Diversity），他的理由是二战以后的城市设计很不成功。而这种设计正好是缺乏了包容性。
基于Jaccob的基础，F提出城市是以商业为中心并吸引skilled workers。然后文章给了证据证明说20世纪以后的城市设计都是围绕一个文化经济中心，然后缺乏了多样性，与Jaccob所认为的不同。

奇怪啊，2位大牛写得人名字都不一样啊，是不是2篇不一样的阅读啊。。。

小情歌璇

我也有这个疑问，问什么名字不一样呢

zhangyangxia

我找到一篇相关的，不过可能也不是考试内容……
http://www.redcritique.org/JulyAugust02/transnationalurbanism.htm