- UID
- 649390
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
板凳

楼主 |
发表于 2011-9-30 10:32:53
|
只看该作者
Line Two works published in 1984 demonstrate 讲述两部作品,B 和L. contrasting approaches to writing the history of United States women. Buel and Buel's biography of B 对把他的故事定位到妇女的近代历史内容中没有什么作用 Mary Fish (1736-1818) makes little effort to place (5) her story in the context of recent historiography on women. Lebsock, meanwhile, attempts not only to 开始讲L 不仅怎么怎么样,而且还怎么怎么样了 write the history of women in one southern community, but also to redirect two decades of historiographical debate as to whether women (10) gained or lost status in the nineteenth century as compared with the eighteenth century. Although 尽管两部作品都给读者提供了对妇女的状态争论的机会,只有L 直接的这样做了?? both books offer the reader the opportunity to assess this controversy regarding women's status, only Lebsock's deals with it directly. She examines 她列举展示了不同方面的女人的状态, 对简化和解决问题有帮助 (15) several different aspects of women's status, helping to refine and resolve the issues. She concludes that 她认为当女人有自主权的时候,特别是在私人领域,她们就会在许多方面失去经济权 while women gained autonomy in some areas, especially in the private sphere, they lost it in many aspects of the economic sphere. More importantly, 更重要的是她展示了争论本身依赖于参考标准: 很多方面,女人因为男人失去了很多(20) she shows that the debate itself depends on frame 权利 of reference: in many respects, women lost power in relation to men, for example, as certain jobs 比如delivering babies, supervising school 这些工作就被男的做了。 (delivering babies, supervising schools) were taken over by men. Yet women also gained power in 但是现在女的相对以前还是获得了一些权利, 比如在房地产中占的比例增高 (25) comparison with their previous status, owning a higher proportion of real estate, for example. In 相反的,B 提供一些原始资料来质疑这样的情况, 一些历史学家也同意, contrast, Buel and Buel's biography provides ample raw material for questioning the myth, fostered by some historians, of a colonial golden age in the raw material of a colonial... 这些原始资料是殖民统治黄金时期的, (30) eighteenth century but does not give the reader 但是没有给读者在争论女人状态的分析上太多指引。 much guidance in analyzing the controversy over women's status. |
|