- UID
- 393008
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2008-11-1
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Listen to the lecture in the animal behavior class. Ok, well, last time we talked about passive animal selection. Like plants, for example, they don’t make active choices about where to grow. They are just first by some other agents like the wind. And if seeds land in the suitable habitat, they do well and reproduce. With active habitat selection, an organism is able to physically choose where to breed and live. And because of animals’ breeding habitat is so important, we’d expect animal species to develop preferences for particularly types of habitats. Places where their offspring has best chance of survival. So let’s look at what the effects have by looking at some of the examples. But first, let’s recap. What do we mean by ‘habitat’, Frank? Well, it’s basically the place or environment where organism normally lives and grows. Right and as we’ve discussed, there are some key elements for the habitat must contain: Food, obviously, water, and it’s gonna have right climate and spaces for physical protection. And we see how important the habitat selection is when we look at habitats where some of these factors were removed perhaps habitat structure. I just read about the shoreberg, the plover. The plover lives by the ocean and feeds on small shellfish, insects and plants. It blends in with sand so it well camouflage for the predator birds above. But it lays its eggs in shallow depressions in the sand with very little protection around them. So if there are people or dogs on the beach, the eggs and nests are really vulnerable. Outing California where there has been a lot of human development by the ocean, the plover’s now a threatened species. So conservation is trying to create new habitat for them. They made artificial beaches and sand bars in areas inaccessible to people and dogs. And plover population is up quite a bit in these areas. Ok, that’s instance where habitat is made less suitable. But now what about cases where animal exhibits clear choice between two suitable habitats. In case like that, does the preference matter? Well, let’s look at the blue warbler. The blue warbler is a s that lives in the North America. They clearly prefer hard wood forests with dense shrubs, bullshits underneath the trees. They actually nest in the shrubs not the trees, so they are pretty close to the ground. But these warblers also nest in the forests that have low shrub density. It is usually the younger warblers nesting in these areas because the preferred spots where there are a lot of shrubs are taken by the older more dominate birds. And the choice of habitat seems to affect reproductive success. The older, more experienced birds who nest in the high density shrub areas have significantly more offspring than those in low density areas which suggest that the choice of where to nest does have impact on the numbers of chicks they have. But preferred habitat doesn’t always seem chorally with great reproductive success. For example, studies have just been done about blank cap warbler. We just call them black caps. The black cap can be found in two different areas. Their preferred habitat is forests near the edges of streams. However, black caps also live in pinewoods away from water. Studies have been done on the reproductive success rate for the birds in both areas. And result showed surprisingly that the reproductive success rate was essentially the same in both areas-the preferred and the second choice habitat. Well, why? It turned out that there are actually four times as many bird pairs or couples living to the stream edge area compare to the area away from the stream. So the stream edge area had much denser population which meant more members of the same species competing for resources. Wanting to feed on resources or build their nests in the same places lower the suitability of the prime habitat even though it’s their preferred habitat. So the results of studies suggest that when the number of competitors in prime habitat reaches a certain point, the second rank habitat has the as successful as the prime habitat just because there are few more members of same species living there. So it looks like competition for resources is another important factor in determining if particular habitat is suitable. |
|