OG227和234代词指代问题

vacationer

以下是引用cg在2005-8-2 14:31:00的发言：

再问

正确选项(B)
Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they can attempt to rebut the testimony, but the Constitution explicitly requires only that thedefendant have the opportunity to confront an accuser in court.

需要用逻辑去判断 they-->指defendants 不是identities
因为只有人可以去attempt to rebut
不过很好奇 会不会有修饰witnesses的歧异呢?

但是在错误选项上
(C)that the defendants should know the identities of all prosecution witnesses so they can attempt a
rebuttal of
(E)making known to defendants the identities of all prosecution witnesses so that they can attempt to rebut

Choices C and E
awkwardly place the plural noun witnesses between the plural pronoun they and its referent, defendants.

这个时候会有歧异 是因为so that 紧接witnesses所以会有指代不清的情形吗？

感觉要在脑子里打好几个转才行

我也觉得有歧义,不过实际上witnesses是不可能rebut the testimony的,所以说按照逻辑意思和常理,实际上是没有歧义的?

晕了,谁来帮忙回答一下?

ustoday

因為witnessess是被動 動作的真正主詞應該是defendant

所以依照句意so that 後面的動作執行者會是defendant 才對

我是這樣推論的

不知道對不對

brissa

以下是引用ustoday在2005-8-25 10:34:00的发言：

因為witnessess是被動 動作的真正主詞應該是defendant

所以依照句意so that 後面的動作執行者會是defendant 才對

我是這樣推論的

不知道對不對

着个应该是虚拟吧，不是什么被动。

huangyh03

up