我疯了，什么逻辑方法都没用啊

透影波心

在用lawyer的方法复习陈向东的ＧＭＡＴ，ＧＲＥ逻辑题　，好多题完全摸不着头脑，方法根本用不上，做对的也都是凭感觉。给ＮＮ们放一个例子，比如这个assumption的，不管怎么取非都别扭，我看了中文都不会ＴＴsome people assert that prosecutors should be allowed to introduce illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials if the judge and jury can be persuaded that the arresting officer was not aware of violating or did not intend to violate the law while seizing the evidence.This proposed "good-faith exception"would weaken everyone's constitutional protection, lead to less careful police practices, and promote lying by law enforcement officers in court.
The argument above for maintaining the prohibition against illegally obtained evidence assumes that

Ａ　defendants in criminal cases should enjoy greater protection from the law than other citizens do
B. law enforcement authorities need to be encouraged to pursue criminals assiduously
C. the legal system will usually find ways to ensure that real crimes do not go unprosecuted
D the prohibition now deters some unlawful searches and seizures
E courts should consider the motives of law enforcement officers indeciding whtether evidence brought forward by the officers is admissible in a trial


求各位大侠指点啊，我泪奔，答案是D

sdcar2010

This is  a poorly written "assumption" question. No need to blame yourself.

透影波心

这道题很不正常吗？我不行了，熬住了，去睡了TT

zhengyy1314

楼主，相见恨晚啊！！！同感啊，摸不到方法做题啊。然后我倒在这题上，已经好几天不想再去翻逻辑了

BIGAppler

没必要时时刻刻想着什么方法，实战中你真的没有那个时间和心思。

这题的意思不就是：有人说只要公诉人能拿到有用的证据，哪怕是有些踩法律红线的取证方法也是可取的。后面就说这种“出发点是好的、取证者性本善论”会让法律形同虚设，人们会不重视践行法律等等。。。

题目这就是在假设：目前法律对这种取证方式的“禁止”是有效的。就是D啊。

透影波心

加油啊，我29号就考了，你应该还有很长时间吧

透影波心

谢谢，突然顿悟了