One fact: scientists are making genetic modifications to increase resistance
cause 1: the amount of insecticide was lower for those geneticly modified seed than those original
cause 2: the modifiied seeds cost more and don't have higher market value
Effect: the modified seed isn't beneficial for cotton farmers economically.
If we change the evaluating sentence, we could regard it as an assumption for this reasoning: the farmers who have tried the modified seed planted as many acres of cotton, on average, as farmers using the ordinary seed. If we say yes, the reasoing is accetable. If we say no, the reasoning is undermined for the results from the farmers' report is irrelevant.
B compares insecticides for cotton with that for other crops, so the comparision is out of the scope.
E says that people who use modified seeds have some special reasons for their decision, so "switching to the modified seed probably benefit those cotton farmers economically".
A,B 两个测试对比,评价测试是否有效,看A,B两个测试的条件是否一致。如果原文中划线部分没有,D就对。the amount of insecticide needed per acre to control insect pests was only slightly lower for those who tried the modified seed than for those who did not.