prep 86 求解释

cyx3271

Junior biomedical researchers have long assumed that their hirings and promotions depend significantly on the amount of their published work.People responsible for making hiring and promotion decisions in the biomedical research field, however, are influenced much more by the overall impact that a candidate's scientific publications have on his or her field than by the number of those publications.

The information above, if accurate, argues most strongly against which of the following claims?

A. Even biomedical researchers who are just beginning their careers are expected already to have published articles of major significance to the field.

B. Contributions to the field of biomedical research are generally considered to be significant only if the work is published.

C. The potential scientific importance of not-yet-published work is sometimes taken into account in decisions regarding the hiring or promotion of biomedical researchers.

D. People responsible for hiring or promoting biomedical researchers can reasonably be expected to make a fair assessment of the overall impact of a candidate's publications on his or her field.

E. Biomedical researchers can substantially increase their chances of promotion by fragmenting their research findings so that they are published in several journals instead of one.

答案是E 想不通````

chasingM7

Premises: 1) juniors assume the more publishment, the better chanse of being promoted
               2) BUT, promotion is more impacted by the influence of the research, instead of the # of publishment.

Question: which answer is against the argument.

新人理解有误，觉得越多越好。其实不是，质量更重要。
E) 发到不同的杂志，升职可能就越高。   明显和argument反着，错！

adamjcw

前面四个选项都和文章的内容没有关系，问题问这个东西最强烈反对什么，这样的题目应该和must be true的题目相类似，结果都应该是文章中已经出现过的关键内容。供探讨

daisydaisytian

最后一个选项说的是在不同的刊物上发行，这样就提高了发行量，那么和题目里的题干相冲突（题目里说的是不因为发行量的多少来衡量一个人）

cyx3271

我觉得 是B 啊 只有被发表才算是在这个领域有贡献啊 所以反驳了 重要的是整体影响而不是论文发表啊
E 说把论文分片段发表 又能说明什么呢 也没有说明有没有 hire 他啊

cyx3271

天啊 这个不是削弱题啊？？？？

cyx3271

如果是削弱的话 B 对不对呢

NNNN 求解答啊啊啊啊啊啊马上就考了 啊啊

Yangkd

不知道LZ还需要不，自己要817考，所以来说说俺的看法~~~~
原文：研究人员认为他们发表的论文数量决定了他们的雇佣和升职。但是负责招聘和员工升职的负责人却说他们更看重发表论文的影响，而不是发表论文的数量。
问：这个结论对下列的哪个选项有削弱或反对的作用~~~
思路：这个结论会破坏重发表论文的数量而非发表论文的质量的观点
选项：
首先，A和D都与原文无关，排除之
其次，C不对，可以轻易排除~~
关于B，我认为不对~~B说只有被发表的文章才被认为是重要的。首先，它没有涉及注重论文发表数量上的缺陷；其次，它跟原文有些切合，虽然不完全。
E是正确选项，E说研究人员将成果分成几部分发表在不同刊物上，以此来获得更多晋升机会~~~

卡卡女爵

难道没有人认为B用only if 表示只要发表管他数量多不多质量好不好就是有贡献的，这不是奇怪的么？而E选项，fragmentation了以后，万一这个文章是impact的，我觉得不能反驳原argument。

酸辣年糕

cyx3271 发表于 2011-8-8 21:37
我觉得 是B 啊 只有被发表才算是在这个领域有贡献啊 所以反驳了 重要的是整体影响而不是论文发表啊 E 说把 ...

同意！