GWD-2-32 求助各位大侠!

ReedSong

请问这是GWD 2中的题吗？我下载的版本中最新试题2中没有这道题呀

xx2004

偶也觉得奇怪，偶也没有这个题。

青鸟

我也没有的，请贴明。

trustme

以下是引用青鸟在2004-7-6 19:20:00的发言：

我也没有的，请贴明。

是吗? 我是几经转手从别人那里讨来的...会不会是题号排列的问题?

davidzhn

不知怎么给绕进去的, 冥想10分钟终于想通了.

B取非:  nonpartisoner report 中, 大部分wasteful的project是总统管辖区的, 只有少部分, 比如1%是反对党管辖区的.

结合原文, 总统取消的项目中, 1% 反对党的wasteful project 却占了90%,  而绝大部分总统自己辖区内的wasteful项目没有被取消.  说明总统还是有偏颇. not + weaken.

(report是公正的) 如果按照怀疑nonpartisoner report的公正性去推理, 很容易给绕进去, 把B当成 not + support.

tony6

偶怎么觉得B应该也不对呢？

Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.

They offer as evidence the fact that 90% of the projects cancelled were in such districts.

But all of the cancelled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.

So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

B. The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.

对B取非，被CANCEL的项目是来自总统所在党控制的地区。那不是印证了 the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.这个结论而不是削弱了吗?

其实对B取非削弱的是CRITIC的结论，那岂不变成了CRITIC的假设了吗？

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-8-29 17:11:34编辑过]

valarie

pay attention to the difference:

B. "The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report " is different from projects recently cancelled.

G_KEVIN

本题与OG-18非常类似

key57

B is correct.

flyfly

好像有一点懂了，似乎是B 在想想