ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 梦之队
打印 上一主题 下一主题

2004年11月梦之队点兵册(75人)

[复制链接]
171#
发表于 2004-9-28 11:07:00 | 只看该作者
我也是,大家多帮忙哦。
172#
发表于 2004-9-28 19:06:00 | 只看该作者

姐姐,我昨晚加入时是32人,今天又跟进几位战友,主题里人数没变呀?

值此中秋佳节之际,祝各位备考亢奋!

173#
发表于 2004-9-29 00:59:00 | 只看该作者

求助:OG/CR#30

这题看了半个小时,也不懂,两个问题,请高手指点。

1,该题是加强(criticism-评价)还是削弱题(criticism-批评)?

2,无论是加强还是削弱,OG选A, 但怎么看,inefficient use of fund 与题干中的military contract毫不相干?!

The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors is determined by a pricing method called “historical costing.” Historical costing allows contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage increase, based on the current rate of inflation, to the previous year’s contractual price.
Which of the following statements, if true, is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as an economically sound pricing method for military contracts?
A. The government might continue to pay for past inefficient use of funds.
B. The rate of inflation has varied considerably over the past twenty years.
C. The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of materials used for the products.
D. Many taxpayers question the amount of money the government spends on military contracts.
E. The pricing method based on historical costing might not encourage the development of innovative weapons.

174#
发表于 2004-9-29 08:43:00 | 只看该作者

欧可以入伙么?

刚被搓了,计划6周后再考。也就是11月左右了,能否切磋?

先谢了。 mmiaoz(A) hotmail.com

175#
发表于 2004-9-29 08:51:00 | 只看该作者
提示: 该帖被管理员或版主屏蔽
176#
发表于 2004-9-29 08:53:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用G-CRACKER在2004-9-29 0:59:00的发言:

求助:OG/CR#30


这题看了半个小时,也不懂,两个问题,请高手指点。


1,该题是加强(criticism-评价)还是削弱题(criticism-批评)?


2,无论是加强还是削弱,OG选A, 但怎么看,inefficient use of fund 与题干中的military contract毫不相干?!


The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors is determined by a pricing method called “historical costing.” Historical costing allows contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage increase, based on the current rate of inflation, to the previous year’s contractual price.
Which of the following statements, if true, is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as an economically sound pricing method for military contracts?
A. The government might continue to pay for past inefficient use of funds.
B. The rate of inflation has varied considerably over the past twenty years.
C. The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of materials used for the products.
D. Many taxpayers question the amount of money the government spends on military contracts.
E. The pricing method based on historical costing might not encourage the development of innovative weapons.



狒狒说这道题超难,而且思路很怪异,最好是不要做,会搅乱你做题的思路的。做出来意义不大。


嗬嗬,偶比较懒,狒狒说不让做就没做拉

177#
发表于 2004-9-29 10:48:00 | 只看该作者

Thank you, Joell

Skidals,  thanks for your information。 虽然难度很大。但还是和同学讨论了一下,该题有一个隐含假设: government must use "fund" to purchase the military weapon. 如果该假设成立,则A correct. 如果不成立,我就晕了。

Is there anybody 可以证明此假设,或者证明这是一个常识性的东东,即从有government那天起,他们买military weapon 就是用fund 而不是用bond, check, cash 或别的????

178#
发表于 2004-9-29 12:47:00 | 只看该作者

报名

11月中考,在家复习,刚背完单词一遍,看到大家都 在讨论题目了,我还没开始,惭愧ing!

deserteagle369(A) hotmail.com

179#
发表于 2004-9-29 13:19:00 | 只看该作者

我也要报名参加啊.

OG做了几遍了.补充材料也搞了几遍了.现在开始LAST的逻辑.

逻辑是我的弱项,忘各位帮忙啊!

qianchengzj@hotmial.com

180#
发表于 2004-9-29 14:41:00 | 只看该作者
funds can be interpreted as assets in this case, so it doesn't matter if it is debt (e.g. bond, mortgage), cash, stocks, property, etc. but this is not the point, the point is that A discredits the assumption of this statement , therefore it is the correct answer regardless of the asset used to purchase the weapons.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-3 09:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部