OG12 137 平行问题（已解决）

soulwangh

zhongshanlh 发表于 2012-3-2 17:16
按照版主的这个解释，那么就是说曼哈顿中的那个错误的例子实际上应该就是对的了吗？？Wrong: I want to ret ...

所以说这个帖子没有解决问题。
Manhattan在第五版避开了这个点。
用的例句如下,而且说明的语法点并不是从句引导词必须一致，而是定语从句的引导词（关系代词或关系副词）都要有。
Wrong: I want to retire to a place WHERE I can relax AND I pay low taxes.
Right:   I want to retire to a place WHERE I can relax AND WHERE I pay low taxes.

之后Manhattan也说引导词（subordinators）不一定要一致（identical），然后给出例句：
Right: There are many people who speak english but whose parents do not.

Stella-Estela

同问啊
C选项比B选项多了一个but，
B的解释是“The two clauses are not parallel, lack a coordinating conjunction, and do not describe the same thing”
C却是“presents the proper logic while maintaining parallel structure and consistent verb tense”
多了个but就能平行了吗

cdbgin009

but前后是两个定语从句的平行，who和whose都指代都一个先行词，为什么不行呢？

MarjorieQ

话说没人好奇为什么后面的and没有连接complete sentence吗？没有主语啊。。。和前面的两个句子是什么关系啊

MarjorieQ

因为不知道 never regains its former status的主语是 reputation还是composer，话说名誉恢复到之前的情况。。。。。

zxzxy1988

MarjorieQ 发表于 2014-1-23 18:15
话说没人好奇为什么后面的and没有连接complete sentence吗？没有主语啊。。。和前面的两个句子是什么关系啊 ...

ron的一个回复可能能帮助到你：
Q;Hi, I understand the parallelism concept in this exercise, but what I find confusing is the use of "but" after the comma because this usage suggests that we should look for a complete clause rather than a modifier.

A:this “rule” is not really a rule. it's an approximate guideline in most cases, but it's definitely not a strict rule.
often, the comma will be omitted when there are two complete clauses -- if those clauses are short enough to render the comma unnecessary.
also -- again quite often -- a comma will be included even if the structures are not complete clauses, especially if the structures are long enough to make the sentence essentially unreadable without the comma.
for instance:
i shut the windows and locked the doors --> this sentence doesn't need any additional punctuation.
i shut the windows so firmly that i would later have trouble opening them, and locked the doors using both the standard locks and the deadbolts --> these are not complete clauses, but the sentence is still written with the comma, because it's absolutely unreadable without the comma (try it yourself).

MOST IMPORTANTLY
PUNCTUATION IS NOT TESTED ON THIS EXAM!
don't bother with “rules” based on punctuation, because (a) gmac doesn't test them, and, more importantly, (b) the vast majority of them will not be hard rules.
the only time you'll want to mind punctuation at all is when it actually differentiates different structures: for instance, “no comma + -ing” is very different from “comma + -ing”.
but, those kinds of things aren't really punctuation issues -- they are issues concerning the resulting structures. for instance, the example i just mentioned would be a modifier issue, not really a punctuation issue.

Hendy

凑凑热闹，OG刷完了，还有几个题哈哈

晓嘉听话

我觉得是不是还是要根据句子的意思呢，who receives popular acclaim 与reputation declines明显就是两个opposite的状况，所以就but表示转折意思会更清楚吧。

晓嘉听话

无敌可爱多 发表于 2011-7-20 21:30
我还是看不太明白你的问题你是觉得but有问题？还是whose有问题？还是都有问题？是要求平行严格一致？ ...

我觉得你的解释是对的，就是关于“指代的都是同一个人，但是只是一个主格，一个所有格”，但是好像这个披萨可乐例子怪怪的，，难怪bat有点保留意见。

heathrine

soulwangh 发表于 2013-8-23 10:06
所以说这个帖子没有解决问题。
Manhattan在第五版避开了这个点。
用的例句如下,而且说明的语法点并不是从 ...

Mark一下！