OG12 137 平行问题（已解决）

ab0

you need "but" in c), because "regains...status" in b) can refer to kind of composer/reputation

superbat28

you need "but" in c), because "regains...status" in b) can refer to kind of composer/reputation

-- by 会员 ab0 (2011/7/23 0:22:46)

Could you explain in more details? I'm not sure whether I fully understand what you mean... Sorry...

aeoluseros

平行本质上讲究的是功能，而不是形式。whose和who引导的都是主语性从句，所以可以平行。
manhattan虽然权威，但即便是OG这样的官方材料也有疏漏的地方，语法的问题还是要从本质来找，比如为何不是同样的词就不能平行，其实词不同是表象，功能不同是本质。

superbat28

平行本质上讲究的是功能，而不是形式。whose和who引导的都是主语性从句，所以可以平行。
manhattan虽然权威，但即便是OG这样的官方材料也有疏漏的地方，语法的问题还是要从本质来找，比如为何不是同样的词就不能平行，其实词不同是表象，功能不同是本质。

-- by 会员 aeoluseros (2011/7/23 15:19:53)

两天接连被版主批评。。恩。。晓得了~也该继续努力了！
我就是对OG解释，manhattan等解释太抠字眼了，没有看本质。
麻烦版主了~

cappuccino202

和LZ同样的疑问啊，斑竹一语点破啊~~~~~

innerwarrior

学习了～

babyciao

引用其他帖子里某NN的简洁解释：
with "but", "who" and "whose" are parallel, both refer to "the kind of composer";
without "but", "who" and "whose" can be ambiguous, "whose" maybe also refers to "living"

米米时代007

求解释A选项为什么不对？描述的仍然是the kind of composer啊？求大牛指点啊~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

lyooo

引用其他帖子里某NN的简洁解释：
with "but", "who" and "whose" are parallel, both refer to "the kind of composer";
without "but", "who" and "whose" can be ambiguous, "whose" maybe also refers to "living"

-- by 会员 babyciao (2011/11/29 10:58:12)

很有道理啊~~~谢谢啦

zhongshanlh

按照版主的这个解释，那么就是说曼哈顿中的那个错误的例子实际上应该就是对的了吗？？
Wrong: I want to retire to a place WHERE I can relax AND THAT has low taxes.
Right:   I want to retire to a place WHERE I can relax AND WHERE the taxes are low.
因为在上面这个错误的例子中where和that指代的都是相同的成分，即a place，同时都是定语从句，描述了这个place所持有的特性，唯一的不同就在于引导词不同及在从句中引导词指代成分所处的成分不同，一个是状语一个是主语。
如果这个例子是正确的话那么我们是不是就可以理解为只要两个从句的属性一样，即使引导词不同也可以平行。
如果我理解不对，上面的例子仍然是错误的话麻烦版主指正是因为什么原因错误的。
谢谢啦！

平行本质上讲究的是功能，而不是形式。whose和who引导的都是主语性从句，所以可以平行。
manhattan虽然权威，但即便是OG这样的官方材料也有疏漏的地方，语法的问题还是要从本质来找，比如为何不是同样的词就不能平行，其实词不同是表象，功能不同是本质。

-- by 会员 aeoluseros (2011/7/23 15:19:53)