ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2024|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

在线等答案。。。求大神指点

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-7-18 23:03:11 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false fire alarms are prank calls made anonymously from fire alarm boxes on street corners. Since virtually everyone has access to a private telephone, these alarm boxes have outlived their usefulness. Therefore, we propose to remove the boxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim that the proposal, if carried out, will have the announced effect?

A.    The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones and records where they came from.
B.    Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately five million dollars annually.
C.    A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information about the nature and size of a fire than can an alarm placed from an alarm box.
D.    Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire department’s capacity for responding to fires.
E.    On any given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones in Springfield are out of service.

对问题不太了解,是削弱呢还是加强呢?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-18 23:38:31 | 只看该作者
自己顶一记,是A呢还是C呢~
板凳
发表于 2011-7-18 23:39:18 | 只看该作者
The answer is D

D means that removing the boxes would help enhance the fire`s department`s capacity  for responding to fires.It,therefore,supports the claim.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-18 23:58:32 | 只看该作者
抱歉,我还在纠结,这个答案权威不?怎么看A也有道理,抱歉~~
5#
发表于 2011-7-19 00:06:52 | 只看该作者
D错 因为用手机也可以乱打火警电话

A对, 如果可以追查到拨打者的信息就会使乱打火警有被警察逮到的风险, 从而起到了降低false call的作用
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-19 00:09:16 | 只看该作者
恩。收到,20号上战场了,谢谢啦~~
7#
发表于 2011-7-19 09:59:33 | 只看该作者
同意A,可以用取非的方法,看是否削弱结论,A取非:火警部门无法找到记录火灾的具体地点,削弱结论。
C:less information 不会对控制火灾的能力影响太大,也许会没有什么效果。
D,还少了个逻辑链:回应错误报警会降低火警部门的应对报警的能力,但不一定用私人电话报警就不会降低其应对报警能力。
8#
发表于 2011-7-19 10:17:35 | 只看该作者
选A 说因为从box打来的电话很多是误报,因为都是匿名电话。所以撤掉dox 人们可以从private
phone 打来电话,误报就能减少。可见private phone是可查的,选A
9#
发表于 2011-7-23 00:13:28 | 只看该作者
OG 12 109原题, 选A
10#
发表于 2011-7-23 00:34:24 | 只看该作者
结论是Removing the boxes will reduce the number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire.
但是原文的premise和这个conclusion有个gap: 就是这个without hampering people’s ability to report a fire==>这个是新内容,argument没有提到过,但是在结论中突然被抬出来了。所以要作为结论的话,必须有个premise来qualify这个情况,相当于assumption把,所以选项找个Removing the boxes 之后依旧能够打电话报警的的内容。看下来就A最合适了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-2-8 13:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部