ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2689|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

急救!OG11th-Q42

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-7-13 06:56:08 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
the fact that superior service can generate a competitive advantage for a company does not mean that every attempt at improving service will create such an advantage. Investment in service, like those in production and distribution, must be balanced against other types of investments on the basis of direct, tangible benefits such as cost reduction and increased revenues. If a company is already effectively on a par with its cometitors because it provides service that avoids a damaging reputation and keeps customers from leaving at an unacceptable rate, then investment in higher service levels may be wasted, since service is a deciding factor for customers only in extreme situations.
.......

Q42. According to the passage, investments in service are comparable to investments in production and distribution in terms of the

A. tangiblility of the benefits that they tend to confer
B. increased revenues that they ultimately produce
C. basis on which they need to be weighed
D. insufficient analysis that managers devote to them
E.  degree of competitive advantage that they are likely to provide

答案是C,但我觉得A 也有道理啊
根据文章中红色部分,推出A 为什么不对呢?

冰天雪地跪求好心人解答
大谢!!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-2-20 08:32:14 | 只看该作者
还是从意思来讲吧,首先要搞清楚题目问什么,题目问services和production and distribution的investment在哪方面是一样或相同的,红字部分讲两个investment必须基于相同的basis来平衡其它类型的投资,benefits的tangibility并没有提到,而C项说要基于一样的基础,need to be weighed和be balanced against我觉得有类似的意义,
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-2-5 06:10
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部