|
GWD1-Q18: It is illegal to advertise prescription medications in Hedland except in professional medical journals or by mail directly to physicians. A proposed law would allow general advertising of prescription medications. Opponents object that, in general, laypersons lack the specialized knowledge to evaluate such advertisements and might ask their physicians for inappropriate medications. But since physicians have the final say as to whether to prescribe a medication for a patient, the objection provides no grounds for concern. 背景：处方药物不可登广告，除非是在职业医学杂志或直接电邮给医师。有个允许其等AD的法案被提出。 反对此法案者认为外行缺少专业知识不会正确评价这些广告、可能会向医师要求不适当的药 结论：这种反对没必要，因为医师有是否为病人开某种药的最终决定权。 Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?评价题的选项只有一个是和原文相关的；文中的结论是因为药师有最后开药的生杀大权,所以反对无效；选项中必然包含这样概念的句子啊。
A. Whether nonprescription medications can interact with and block the action of any prescription medications that could be advertised to the general public无关 B. Whether most prescription medication advertisements directed at the general public would be advertisements for recently developed medications newly available by prescription C. Whether prescription medication advertisements directed at the general public would appear on television and radio as well as in print D. Whether physicians are more likely to pay attention to advertising directed to the general public than to advertising directed to physicians Whether physicians are likely to succumb to pressure from patients to prescribe inappropriate medications | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2008-3-11 05:00:00
