ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: zhgoqiang
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[坐稳]齐领舞起坐稳寂静汇总(共81只,欺二四更新)

[精华] [复制链接]
221#
发表于 2011-7-19 17:19:12 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼主啦~拿走了
222#
发表于 2011-7-19 18:03:13 | 只看该作者
威武,~~
223#
发表于 2011-7-19 19:39:19 | 只看该作者

CD 上的这种精神真让人感动!

CD 上的这种精神真让人感动!感谢!
224#
发表于 2011-7-20 00:54:06 | 只看该作者
本月ai34是这个

25本月机经 5上月机经5

No.68 “Since the physical work environment affects employee productivity and morale, the employees themselves should have the right to decide how their workplace is designed.”
68. “由于物理工作环境影响雇员的生产力和士气,雇员自身应该有权决定如何设计他们的工作场所。

提供观点:

1.brings creativity and coziness

2.makes colleagues more closely and companionate

3.Admittedly, some companies such as consulting/consultant? company must avoid too much decoration.
However, no matter the employee or the employer, as for the environment is considered, compromise should be made from time to time.



View1: work character has great influence on the design of workplace.

Evidence: consulting company must avoid too much decoration in order to appear professionally and dependably. To some creative work such as AD agency and fashion design, the decorating of workplace is important not only for simulating inspirations but also for showing creative abilities.

View2: also, the designment of workplace should be compromise to company culture.

Evidence: Consider the influence it has done to co-workers and the harmony in work place.



北美范文:

I agree that physical workspace can affect morale and productivity and that, as a result, employees should have a significant voice in how their work areas are designed. However, the speaker suggests that each employee should have full autonomy over his or her immediate workspace, I think this view is too extreme, for it ignores two important problems that allowing too much freedom over workspace (工作区;工作空间) can create.

On the one hand, I agree that some aspects of workspace design are best left to the individual preferences of each worker. Location of personal tools and materials, style and size of desk chair, and even desk lighting and decorative desk items, can each play an important role in a worker’s comfort, psychological wellbeing, concentration, and efficiency. Moreover, these features involve highly subjective preferences, so it would be inappropriate for anyone but the worker to make such choices.

On the other hand, control over one’s immediate workspace should not go unchecked, for two reasons. First, one employee’s workspace design may inconvenience (v. to subject to inconvenience: put to trouble), annoy, or even offend nearby coworkers. For example, pornographic pinups ([钉在墙上的]偶像,偶像照片[例如裸体女人或影星、歌星的照片]) may distract some coworkers and offend others, thereby impeding productivity, fostering ill-will and resentment, and increasing attrition—all to the detriment of the company. Admittedly, the consequences of most workspace choices would not be so far-reaching. Still, in my observation many people adhere, consciously or not, to the adage that one person’s rights extend only so far as the next person’s nose (or ears. or eyes). A second problem with affording too much workspace autonomy occurs when workspaces are not clearly delineated—by walls and doors—or when workers share an immediate workspace. In such cases, giving all workers concurrent authority would perpetuate conflict and undermine productivity.

In conclusion, although employees should have the freedom to arrange their work areas, this freedom is not absolute. Managers would be well-advised to arbitrate workspace disputes and, if needed, assume authority to make final decisions about workspace design.
225#
发表于 2011-7-20 00:54:49 | 只看该作者
ai31和29重复
226#
发表于 2011-7-20 00:57:00 | 只看该作者
ai37是这个


40本月机经 3上月机经6



No.65 “The rise of multinational corporations is leading to global homogeneity*. Because people everywhere are beginning to want the same products and services, regional differences are rapidly disappearing.”

·homogeneity: sameness, similarity65

65. “跨国公司的兴起导致全球一体化。因为所有地方的人们都开始需要同样的服务和产品,地区差异正迅速消失。

提供观点:

1.The so-called cultural innovation does exists. Let's take KFC as an example. Its standard design, decoration and food supplied in every chain all around the world influence people consume its product and service.

2.However, to say the multinational corporations do no good to promote and improve the unique culture of the nations where their branches are located is very imprudent.

3.Ideally, the multinational corporations should incorporate the culture of the target country's cultrue with the corporate culture and the culture it belongs to.



反对。

1,首先,前提是错误的。因为各地差异不同,所以全球化的大公司,想在所有地方都提供一样的产品服务是不现实的。empirical evidence: 很多成功的大企业,往往是那些充分认识到不同,从而采用不同的策略的。不能保持完全一致的策略,let alone更不用说完全一样的产品和服务。比如:KFCfast food,在中国都针对口味偏好开发了很多新产品。

2,Moreover, 地区差异不会消失,有更深层次的原因on much deeper level。第一,文化的差异,信仰的不同,很难靠产品和服务改变。比如,即使使用最先进的日本Panasonic产的电视,美国人用来传播transmit democratic principles, while中国人可能用来publicize the thoughts of Mao, or Confucius… 第二,习俗的差异,custom。比如,尽管很多年轻人在中国开始celebrate the Valentine’s Day, 但是在所有中国人心中,最重要的节日仍然是Spring Festival。这是什么样的产品都不能改变的。



Optional words:

Homogeneity/ homogeneous/ homogenize/

Difference/ divergence/ deviation/ variance/ disagreement/ conflict

Thesis sentence:

View1: the development of multinational corporations does enhance global unity by bringing the same methods of business administration as well as products and services throughout the world.

Evidence: western fast food bring by global chain express such us McDonald’s and KFC have change our diet habits a lot

View2: however, the effect of multinational corporations is far from eliminating regional deference. The corporations itself is blend in the regional features.

Evidence: Lay’s, one of the most successful multinational food manufacturers, add some flavor of traditional Asian dishes to its potato chips in order to attract foreign customers.

北美范文:

Although global homogeneity in a broader sense may not be as inexorable as the speaker here suggests, I agree that multinational corporations are indeed creating global sameness in consumer preferences. This homogeneity is manifested in two concurrent megatrends (n. 大趋势): (1) the embracing of American popular culture throughout the world, and (2) a synthesis of cultures, as reflected in consumer preferences.

The first trend is toward Americanization (美国化) of popular culture throughout the world. In food and fashion, once a nation’s denizens “fall into the Gap” or get a taste of a Coke or Big Mac, their preferences are forever Westernized. The ubiquitous Nike “swoosh,” which nearly every soccer player in the world will soon don, epitomizes this phenomenon. In media, the cultural agendas of giants such as Time-Warner (华纳兄弟娱乐公司) now drive the world’s entertainment preferences. The Rolling Stones and the stars of America
’s prime-time television shows are revered among young people worldwide, while Mozart’s music, Shakespeare’s prose, and Ghandi’s ideology are largely ignored.
A second megatrend is toward a synthesis of cultures into a homogenous stew. The popularity of “world music” and of the “New Age” health care and leisure-time activities aptly illustrate this blending of Eastern, Western and third-world cultures. Perhaps nowhere is the cultural-stew paradigm more striking, and more bland (blander), than at the international “food courts” now featured in malls throughout the developed world.

These trends appear inexorable. Counter-attacks, such as Ebonies, rap music, and bilingual education, promote the distinct culture of minority groups, but not of nations. Further homogenization of consumer preferences is all but (adv. 简直是,几乎跟..一样)ensured by failing trade barriers, coupled with the global billboard that satellite communications and the Internet provide.

In sum, American multinationals have indeed instigated a homogeneous global, yet American-style, consumerism—one which in all likelihood will grow in extent along with free-market capitalism and global connectivity.



227#
发表于 2011-7-20 03:42:29 | 只看该作者
本月寂静第2个的v3并不是那道,而是这个



10本月机经 4上月机经>1(没看见啊,但是我上月考的就是这个)

No.36 “Businesses and other organizations have overemphasized the importance of working as a team. Clearly, in any human group, it is the strong individual, the person with the most commitment and energy, who gets things done.”

36. “企业和其他组织过分强调了团队工作的重要性。很明显,在任何人类团体里,都是最强的个人,那个具有最多义务和能量的人,把事情完成的。
228#
发表于 2011-7-20 09:19:19 | 只看该作者
谢谢,加油楼主
229#
发表于 2011-7-20 09:46:25 | 只看该作者
LZ 有没有发现AI部分有两个25啊
230#
发表于 2011-7-20 10:05:15 | 只看该作者

辛苦啦, 感谢

辛苦啦, 感谢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-1 02:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部