请问第三宗和第七宗罪有什么不同啊?

龍之哀伤

这两个不都是assumption错了吗?
第三宗罪:错误类比 (based on a false analogy )<横向>
The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects.This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison betweenA and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A..., however, B....Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do...
第七宗罪 结论无据 gratuitousassumption
The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that.... However, noevidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this isnot necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that.... Therefore,this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility

毛毛carina

这个，很不一样呀

错误类比是拿两个东西做不合理的类比，例子一：百度采取了某种措施从而占领了中国内地多少多少的市场，所以，Bing采取同样的措施也能达到占领多少市场的目标。 例子二：A市采取什么措施降低了犯罪率，所以B市采取同样措施也能降低犯罪率


结论无据是指这个因果推理链不成立，比如：今年选择种植玉米的农民多了，所以，今年玉米价格一定会上升。

龍之哀伤

毛毛版主我问错了, 我是想说错误因果和那个assumption那个罪有什么不同, 比如你说的那个例子:
今年选择种植玉米的农民多了，所以，今年玉米价格一定会上升。
我觉得说成因果应该也说得通吧....好纠结, 谢了几个了都感觉有这个问题