For question 9` When I took the exercise, I thought C was irrelevant, so I eliminated it withoout thinking carefully.
I think the premises of question 9 are: TV sales in B don't change, TV assembled in B decrease conclusion: B import more TV from C
negate AD can make the conclusion fall apart. why these mistakes took place? Could you please tell me how to tell the relevant and irrelevant options. Thanke you``
今天重新看了9题· 发现当时把 assemblers看成了assembled了·· 文章的推理: assemblers in B decrease --> television imported from V increased 中间有个gap: drop in assembler -->drop in television asselbed in B which is related to the efficiency of the assemblers
仔细想想当时自己错的原因是认为 B地卖的TV不变· TV assembled in B decrease (当时的想法,后来证实是错的), tv imported from V increase 自己当时觉得有个gap: B的减少,不能推出 减少量就是来自V 心想如果可以找到能够证明 B的减少就是V增加的就可以补全这个GAP 但是后来看LZ在问答别人问题时·有一点 :"These TV's come from both B and V" 请问下楼主通过看文章 是怎么得出这个隐含条件的吖?