ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: zj1983
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD7-35,36

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2005-10-13 00:06:00 | 只看该作者
你的意思是...... B对? (35题, 楼上的说)
22#
发表于 2005-10-28 16:22:00 | 只看该作者

我也选A


C 说  为现在downsizing发生的解释提供另外一种解释,但是文章中说 Other factors 必须考虑,然后说


One such factor is the evolution of downsizing into a powerful business myth



因此,可以推断应该有很多的解释,而不是c说的一种



23#
发表于 2006-2-16 23:38:00 | 只看该作者

大家有没有注意35A中:operating efficiencies 文章没提过的,我想operating efficiencies 和efficiencies 是不同的吧,A应该不对。


另外mythic properties告诉我们:要到L40定位,紧记定位解体。


支持B。

24#
发表于 2006-8-24 19:52:00 | 只看该作者

Q34-的C 说 occurrence of downsizing,全文说的是downsizing的出现吗?我怎么觉得是Downsizing的效果呀。

 

25#
发表于 2007-5-21 10:02:00 | 只看该作者

对啊!我也是这么认为的,所以选B,谁能告诉我B为什么不对呢?

26#
发表于 2007-8-7 10:51:00 | 只看该作者
楼上的mm,文中虽然有提到negative effect, 但是没有继续,而是说non-economic 必须被考虑,紧接着one of such factors is blablabal....
yet
recent research has shown that the
    

actual economic effects of downsizing


    


                (15)      are often negative for firms.  Thus,


    

organization theory cannot adequately


    

explain downsizing;
            non-economic


    

factors must also be considered.


    

One such factor is the evolution of


    


                (20)      downsizing into a powerful business


    

       myth:  managers simply believe that


    

       downsizing is efficacious.  Moreover,


    

downsizing nowadays is greeted


    

favorably by the business press; the


    


                (25)      press often refers to soaring stock


    

prices of downsizing firms (even though


    

research shows that stocks usually


    

rise only briefly after downsizing and


    

then suffer a prolonged decline).


    


                (30)      Once viewed as a sign of desperation,


    

downsizing is now viewed as a signal


    

that firms are serious about competing


    

       in the global marketplace; such signals


    

are received positively by key actors—


    


                (35)    financial analysts, consultants,


    

shareholders—who supply firms with


    

vital organizing resources.  Thus, even


    

if downsizers do not become economi-


    

      cally more efficient, downsizing’s mythic


    


                (40)     properties give them added prestige


    

in the business community, enhancing


    

their survival prospects.

27#
发表于 2007-8-7 12:04:00 | 只看该作者
Once viewed as a sign of desperation,
    

downsizing is now viewed as a signal


    

that firms are serious about competing


    

       in the global marketplace; such signals


    

are received positively by key actors—


    


                (35)    financial analysts, consultants,


    

shareholders—who supply firms with


    

vital organizing resources.  Thus, even


    

if downsizers do not become economi-


    

      cally more efficient, downsizing’s mythic


    


                (40)     properties give them added prestige


    

in the business community, enhancing


    

their survival prospects.

那位xdjm可以帮我翻译一下这句话,牛牛们说Q35的B选项出自此处, 为什么我看不出来 ?谢谢....


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-8-7 12:07:33编辑过]
28#
发表于 2007-8-22 02:45:00 | 只看该作者

这篇文章我读了十几遍,我对36题提出质疑!

我认为应该选C!!!!

the claim that a firm will become more efficient and competitive by downsizing,

这句claim没错,错的是理论根据,traditional organizational theory 不能解释之,但是新的理论可以,

C说该claim和organizational theory的前提相悖,是正确答案!


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-8-22 2:45:57编辑过]
29#
发表于 2007-9-8 16:28:00 | 只看该作者

强烈支持ls36题的答案,有nn出来确认一下吗?

30#
发表于 2007-10-20 17:03:00 | 只看该作者

唉,明白了……

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-7 02:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部